Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests

被引:88
作者
Galan, L
Biscay, R
Rodriguez, JL
PerezAbalo, MC
Rodriguez, R
机构
[1] Cuban Neuroscience Center, Av. 25, Playa, Havana
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1997年 / 102卷 / 03期
关键词
statistical analysis; event-related potential; brain topographic analysis; permutation tests;
D O I
10.1016/S0013-4694(96)95155-3
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
MANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA approaches have provided evidence of a number of limitations in several event-related potential (ERP) studies due to violations of their statistical assumptions and the typically moderate size of the available sample. Alternative, computer-intensive methods based on permutation principles have recently been developed. Up to now this methodology has focused mostly on magnitude differences between scalp distributions as measured by t statistics. In this paper the scope of permutation techniques in ERP analysis was widened. A new statistic (D statistic) is introduced to compare the shapes of scalp distributions of ERPs. Additionally a general non-parametric combinatory technique is introduced to evaluate, by means of multivariate permutation tests, several time points and/or recording sites in ERP data. The methodology described here was used to test if two ERP components elicited during word-pair matching tasks to semantic or phonological incongruences had different scalp distributions. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 247
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Blair R.C., 1994, Functional Neuroimaging: Technical Foundations, P19
[2]   AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR SIGNIFICANCE TESTING OF WAVE-FORM DIFFERENCE POTENTIALS [J].
BLAIR, RC ;
KARNISKI, W .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 30 (05) :518-524
[3]   MODEL PARAMETERS ESTIMATION WHEN THE EVOKED-POTENTIAL RECORDINGS ARE AFFECTED BY A RANDOM SCALE FACTOR [J].
CARBALLOGONZALEZ, JA ;
RIERADIAZ, JJ ;
BISCAYLIRIO, R ;
VALDESSOSA, PA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-MEDICAL COMPUTING, 1992, 30 (02) :71-87
[4]  
EDDINGTON ES, 1987, RANDOMIZATION TESTS
[5]   ON METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF PROFILE DATA [J].
GREENHOUSE, SW ;
GEISSER, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1959, 24 (02) :95-112
[6]  
Huynh H., 1976, J EDUC STATIST, V1, P69, DOI [DOI 10.3102/10769986001001069, 10.2307/1164736, DOI 10.2307/1164736]
[7]  
Huynh H., 1970, J AM STAT ASSOC, V65, P1582, DOI DOI 10.1080/01621459.1970.10481187
[8]   EDITORIAL POLICY ON ANALYSES OF VARIANCE WITH REPEATED MEASURES [J].
JENNINGS, JR .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (04) :474-475
[9]   EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS TO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND SEMANTIC ANOMALIES [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (05) :539-550
[10]   SPATIAL-ANALYSIS OF EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MAN - A REVIEW [J].
LEHMANN, D ;
SKRANDIES, W .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1984, 23 (03) :227-250