Effects of spatial variability in light use efficiency on satellite-based NPP monitoring

被引:106
作者
Turner, DP [1 ]
Gower, ST
Cohen, WB
Gregory, M
Maiersperger, TK
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] USDA, PNW Res Stn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00319-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Light use efficiency (LUE) algorithms are a potentially effective approach to monitoring global net primary production (NPP) using satellite-borne sensors such as the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). However, these algorithms are applied at relatively coarse spatial resolutions 1 km, which may subsume significant heterogeneity in vegetation LUE (epsilon(n), g MJ(-1) and, hence, introduce error. To examine the effects of spatial heterogeneity on a LUE algorithm, imagery from the Advanced very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) at 1-km resolution was used to implement a LUE approach for NTP estimation over a 25-km(2) area of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max Merr.) in central Illinois, USA. Results from several E. formulations were compared with a NIPP reference surface based on measured NPPs and a high spatial resolution land cover surface derived from Landsat ETM+. Determination of E. based on measurements of biomass production and monitoring of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) revealed that E of soybean was 68% of that for corn. When a LUE algorithm for estimating NTPP was implemented in the study area using the assumption of homogeneous cropland and the En for corn, the estimate for total biomass production was 126% of that from the NPP reference surface. Because of counteracting errors, total biomass production using the soybean epsilon(n) was closer (86%) to that from the NPP reference surface. Retention of high spatial resolution land cover to assign epsilon(n) resulted in a total NPP very similar to the reference NPP because differences in leaf phenology between the crop types were small except early in the growing season. These results suggest several alternative approaches to accounting for land cover heterogeneity in E. when implementing LUE algorithms at coarse resolution. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 405
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES BASED ON FRACTIONS OF ENDMEMBERS - APPLICATION TO LAND-COVER CHANGE IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON
    ADAMS, JB
    SABOL, DE
    KAPOS, V
    ALMEIDA, R
    ROBERTS, DA
    SMITH, MO
    GILLESPIE, AR
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 52 (02) : 137 - 154
  • [2] *ASHT, 2001, ASHT PREC PROD
  • [3] ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT
    ASRAR, G
    FUCHS, M
    KANEMASU, ET
    HATFIELD, JL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) : 300 - 306
  • [4] Biospheric primary production during an ENSO transition
    Behrenfeld, MJ
    Randerson, JT
    McClain, CR
    Feldman, GC
    Los, SO
    Tucker, CJ
    Falkowski, PG
    Field, CB
    Frouin, R
    Esaias, WE
    Kolber, DD
    Pollack, NH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5513) : 2594 - 2597
  • [5] CAMPBELL JL, 1999, BIG FOOT CHARACTERIZ
  • [6] Chavez PS, 1996, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V62, P1025
  • [7] Seasonal AVHRR multichannel data sets and products for studies of surface-atmosphere interactions
    Cihlar, J
    Chen, J
    Li, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D24) : 29625 - 29640
  • [8] SPECTRAL ESTIMATES OF ABSORBED RADIATION AND PHYTOMASS PRODUCTION IN CORN AND SOYBEAN CANOPIES
    DAUGHTRY, CST
    GALLO, KP
    GOWARD, SN
    PRINCE, SD
    KUSTAS, WP
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 39 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [9] CARBON-DIOXIDE BUDGET OF MAIZE
    DESJARDINS, RL
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1985, 36 (01) : 29 - 41
  • [10] IMPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM YIELD DIFFERENCES ON DISTRIBUTIONS OF C3 AND C4 GRASSES
    EHLERINGER, JR
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1978, 31 (03) : 255 - 267