Subject retention in a controlled clinical trial

被引:21
作者
Good, M [1 ]
Schuler, L [1 ]
机构
[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,POSTOPERAT PAIN STUDY,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
关键词
subject retention; clinical trials; experimental design;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026351.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Threats to subject retention in a controlled clinical trial require strategies that encourage continued participation of subjects, with consideration of the effect of the strategies on the dependent variable. Methods to encourage retention must be based on sensitivity to the patient's changing condition and perspective. Primary considerations in the design and implementation of an intervention study are the acceptability of the intervention to particular patients and the compatibility of the intervention with other care activities. In addition, qualities of the research personnel and changes in patient conditions are important factors in retention of subjects, Vignettes illustrate the threats to retention and solutions used in a clinical trial. Threats to retention include the research nurse's approach and patient factors such as worries, control issues, visitors, symptoms of confusion and pain, and lack of cooperation. Retention strategies include supporting and educating research nurses, providing empathy and respect, including patients in decisions, negotiating with visitors, alleviating symptoms, and supporting a plan of care consistent with both the research protocol and the patient's recovery. While providing a similar approach to all groups, experimental researchers in a variable clinical environment must also provide some individualization and communication to retain valuable subjects who are ill.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 355
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Beck C T, 1984, West J Nurs Res, V6, P331, DOI 10.1177/019394598400600303
  • [2] Day, 1979, QUASIEXPERIMENTATION, V351
  • [3] ISSUES IN CONDUCTING RESEARCH WITH VULNERABLE FAMILIES
    DEMI, AS
    WARREN, NA
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 1995, 17 (02) : 188 - 202
  • [4] GIVEN BA, 1990, NURS RES, V39, P184
  • [5] Martin K M, 1994, Clin Nurse Spec, V8, P18, DOI 10.1097/00002800-199401000-00008
  • [6] MORESE EV, 1995, APPL NURSING RES, V8, P8
  • [7] APPROACHES TO THE PROBLEM OF RESPONDENT ATTRITION IN A LONGITUDINAL PANEL STUDY OF NURSES CAREERS
    ROBINSON, S
    MARSLAND, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 20 (04) : 729 - 741
  • [8] RESEARCH INCENTIVES - MONEY VERSUS GIFTS
    RUDY, EB
    ESTOK, PJ
    KERR, ME
    MENZEL, L
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 1994, 43 (04): : 253 - 255
  • [9] Wineman N M, 1992, West J Nurs Res, V14, P526, DOI 10.1177/019394599201400411