The psychology of social dilemmas: A review

被引:523
作者
Van Lange, Paul A. M. [1 ]
Joireman, Jeff [1 ]
Parks, Craig D. [1 ]
Van Dijk, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Social dilemma; Human cooperation; Trust; Reward; Punishment; Self-interest; Social decision making; TIT-FOR-TAT; PUBLIC GOOD DILEMMAS; VALUE ORIENTATION; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT; COMPETITIVE ALTRUISM; INTERGROUP CONFLICT; TACIT COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Broadly defined, social dilemmas involve a conflict between immediate self-interest and longer-term collective interests. These are challenging situations because acting in one's immediate self-interest is tempting to everyone involved, even though everybody benefits from acting in the longer-term collective interest. As such, greater knowledge of social dilemmas should help us understand not only the theoretical puzzles of why people cooperate (or not) but also the ways in which cooperation in groups and organizations can be maintained or promoted. This article reviews different types of social dilemmas, highlights recent developments in the field (especially within psychology), and suggests some new avenues for future research. We illustrate that the field of social dilemma is growing and flourishing in terms of theory, interdisciplinary collaboration, and applicability, producing insights that are novel, replicable, and applicable to many social situations where short-term self-interest is at odds with the long-term interests of teams, organizations, or nations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 141
页数:17
相关论文
共 196 条
[1]  
Allison S. T., 1990, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V3, P195, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960030304
[2]   SOCIAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES AND THE EQUAL PARTITIONMENT OF SHARED RESOURCES [J].
ALLISON, ST ;
MCQUEEN, LR ;
SCHAERFL, LM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 28 (01) :23-42
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CONT PSYCHOL RES SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ATLAS INTERPERSONAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HDB THEORIES SOCIAL, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446249222.N39
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC
[7]  
Au W.T., 2004, CONT RES SOCIAL DILE, P71
[8]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[9]  
Balliet D., PERSPECTIVE IN PRESS
[10]   Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Ferris, D. Lance .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2013, 120 (02) :298-308