Global-scale electron precipitation features seen in UV and X rays during substorms

被引:35
作者
Ostgaard, N [1 ]
Stadsnes, J
Bjordal, RR
Vondrak, RR
Cummer, SA
Chenette, DL
Parks, GK
Brittnacher, MJ
McKenzie, DL
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Phys, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
[2] NASA, Extraterr Phys Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Lockheed Martin Adv Technol Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Geophys Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Aerospace Corp, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1999JA900004
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The Polar Ionospheric X-ray Imaging Experiment (PIXIE) and the ultraviolet imager (WI) onboard the Polar satellite have provided the first simultaneous global-scale views of the patterns of electron precipitation through imaging of the atmospheric X-ray bremsstrahlung and the auroral ultraviolet (UV) emissions. While the UV images respond to the total electron energy flux, which is usually dominated by electron energies below 10 keV, the PIXIE, 9.9-19.7 keV X-ray images used in this study respond only to electrons of energy above 10 keV. Previous studies by ground-based, balloon, and space observations have indicated that the patterns of energetic electron precipitation differ significantly from those found in the visible and the UV auroral oval. Because of the lack of global imaging of the energetic electron precipitation, one has not been able to establish a complete picture. In this study the development of the electron precipitation during the different phases of magnetospheric substorms is examined. Comparisons are made between the precipitation patterns of the high-energy (PIXIE) and low-energy (UVI) electron populations, correlated with ground-based observations and geosynchronous satellite data. We focus on one specific common feature in the energetic precipitation seen in almost every isolated substorm observed by PIXIE during 1996 and which differs significantly from what is seen in the UV images. Delayed relative to substorm onsets, we observe a localized maximum of X-ray emission at 5-9 magnetic local time. By identifying the location of the injection region and determining the substorm onset time it is found that this maximum most probably is caused by electrons injected in the midnight sector drifting (i.e,, gradient and curvature drift) into a region in the dawnside magnetosphere where some mechanism effectively scatters the electrons into the loss cone.
引用
收藏
页码:10191 / 10204
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Akasofu, 1968, POLAR MAGNETOSPHERIC
[2]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AURORAL SUBSTORM [J].
AKASOFU, SI .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1964, 12 (04) :273-282
[3]   ENERGY SPECTRUM FOR AURORAL-ZONE X RAYS .I. DIURNAL AND TYPE EFFECTS [J].
BARCUS, JR ;
ROSENBERG, TJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1966, 71 (03) :803-+
[4]   BREMSSTRAHLUNG IN ATMOSPHERE [J].
BERGER, MJ ;
SELTZER, SM .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1972, 34 (01) :85-&
[5]   SYNOPTIC INVESTIGATION OF PARTICLE PRECIPITATION DYNAMICS FOR 60 SUBSTORMS IN IQSY (1964-1965) AND IASY (1969) [J].
BERKEY, FT ;
DRIATSKIY, VM ;
HENRIKSEN, K ;
HULTQVIST, B ;
JELLY, DH ;
SHCHUKA, TI ;
THEANDER, A ;
YLINIEMI, J .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1974, 22 (02) :255-307
[6]   MORPHOLOGY OF AURORAL-ZONE X-RAY EVENTS .1. DYNAMICS OF MIDNIGHT EVENTS [J].
BJORDAL, J ;
TREFALL, H ;
ULLALAND, S ;
BEWERSDORFF, A ;
KANGAS, J ;
TANSKANEN, P ;
KREMSER, G ;
SAEGER, KH ;
SPECHT, H .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1971, 33 (04) :605-+
[7]   INFLUENCE OF MAGNETOSPHERIC CONVECTION AND POLAR WIND ON LOSS OF ELECTRONS FROM OUTER RADIATION BELT [J].
BRICE, N ;
LUCAS, C .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (04) :900-+
[8]  
CHENETTE DL, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1745, P16, DOI 10.1117/12.60596
[9]   What is a global auroral substorm? [J].
Elphinstone, RD ;
Murphree, JS ;
Cogger, LL .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02) :169-232
[10]  
ELPHINSTONE RD, 1991, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V64, P257