Selective attention and audiovisual integration: Is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration?

被引:339
作者
Talsma, Durk
Doty, Tracy J.
Woldorff, Marty G.
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Cognit Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
auditory; binding; electrophysiology; multisensory; visual;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhk016
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Interactions between multisensory integration and attention were studied using a combined audiovisual streaming design and a rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. Event-related potentials (ERPs) following audiovisual objects (AV) were compared with the sum of the ERPs following auditory (A) and visual objects (V). Integration processes were expressed as the difference between these AV and (A + V) responses and were studied while attention was directed to one or both modalities or directed elsewhere. Results show that multisensory integration effects depend on the multisensory objects being fully attended-that is, when both the visual and auditory senses were attended. In this condition, a superadditive audiovisual integration effect was observed on the P50 component. When unattended, this effect was reversed; the P50 components of multisensory ERPs were smaller than the unisensory sum. Additionally, we found an enhanced late frontal negativity when subjects attended the visual component of a multisensory object. This effect, bearing a strong resemblance to the auditory processing negativity, appeared to reflect late attention-related processing that had spread to encompass the auditory component of the multisensory object. In conclusion, our results shed new light on how the brain processes multisensory auditory and visual information, including how attention modulates multisensory integration processes.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 690
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Event-related potentials: A methods handbook
[2]   The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention [J].
Bertelson, P ;
Vroomen, J ;
de Gelder, B ;
Driver, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (02) :321-332
[3]   Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating [J].
Boutros, NN ;
Belger, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (07) :917-922
[4]   The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object [J].
Busse, L ;
Roberts, KC ;
Crist, RE ;
Weissman, DH ;
Woldorff, MG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (51) :18751-18756
[5]   Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex [J].
Calvert, GA ;
Campbell, R ;
Brammer, MJ .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (11) :649-657
[6]   Event-related potentials and audiovisual stimuli:: multimodal interactions [J].
Czigler, I ;
Balázs, L .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (02) :223-226
[7]   Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading [J].
Driver, J .
NATURE, 1996, 381 (6577) :66-68
[8]   ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention [J].
Eimer, M ;
Schröger, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 35 (03) :313-327
[9]   Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification [J].
Fort, A ;
Delpuech, C ;
Pemier, J ;
Giard, MH .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (01) :20-30
[10]   Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans [J].
Fort, A ;
Delpuech, C ;
Pernier, J ;
Giard, MH .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2002, 12 (10) :1031-1039