Spatial optimization of protected area placement incorporating ecological, social and economical criteria

被引:48
作者
Christensen, Villy [1 ]
Ferdana, Zach [2 ]
Steenbeek, Jeroen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fisheries Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Nature Conservancy, Global Marine Initiat, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, UNIGIS, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ecopath with Ecosim; Ecospace; Ecosystem model; Marxan; Marine zoning; Critical fish habitat; EXPLOITED ECOSYSTEMS; MARINE RESERVES; STRATEGIES; IMPACTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.029
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We describe two approaches for spatial optimization of protected area placement, both based on maximizing an objective function that incorporates ecological, social, and economical criteria. Of these, a seed cell selection procedure works by evaluating potential cells for protection one by one, picking the one that maximizes the objective function, adding seed cells. This continues to full protection of the project area. The other is a Monte Carlo approach, which uses a likelihood sampling procedure based on weighted importance layers of conservation interest to evaluate alternative protected area sizing and placement. This is similar to the objective function of Marxan, a priority-selection decision-support tool based on optimization algorithms using geographic information system data. The two approaches are alternative options in a common spatial optimization module, which uses the time- and spatial-dynamic Ecospace model for the evaluations. The optimizations are implemented as components of the Ecopath with Ecosim approach and software. In a case study, we find that there can be protected area zoning that will accommodate economical and social factors, without causing ecological deterioration. We also find a tradeoff between including cells of special conservation interest, and the economic and social interests. While this does not need to be a general feature, it emphasizes the need to use modeling techniques to evaluate the tradeoff. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2583 / 2593
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Modifying Kempton's species diversity index for use with ecosystem simulation models [J].
Ainsworth, Cameron H. ;
Pitcher, Tony J. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2006, 6 (03) :623-630
[2]   Exploring fisheries strategies for the western English Channel using an ecosystem model [J].
Araujo, Julio N. ;
Mackinson, Steue ;
Stanford, Richard J. ;
Hart, Paul J. B. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 210 (04) :465-477
[3]   Exploring ecosystem-based harvesting strategies to recover the collapsed pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) fishery in the southern Gulf of Mexico [J].
Arreguin-Sanchez, Francisco ;
Zetina-Rejon, Manuel ;
Ramirez-Rodriguez, Mauricio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 214 (2-4) :83-94
[4]  
Ball I.R., 2000, MARXAN (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing
[5]  
BEATTIE A, 2001, THESIS U BRIT COLUMB
[6]  
Beattie Alasdair, 2002, Natural Resource Modeling, V15, P413
[7]  
Beck M.N., 2003, Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity, P319
[8]   Nestedness, biogeographic theory, and the design of nature reserves [J].
Boecklen, WJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 112 (01) :123-142
[9]   ECOSYSTEM MATURITY - TOWARDS QUANTIFICATION [J].
CHRISTENSEN, V .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1995, 77 (01) :3-32
[10]  
Christensen V, 2004, B MAR SCI, V74, P549