Assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient: When is the assessment reliable?

被引:79
作者
Gombar, VK
Enslein, K
机构
[1] Health Designs, Inc., Rochester, NY 14604
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES | 1996年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci960028n
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A model, VLOGP, has been developed for assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, of chemicals from their structures. Unlike group contribution methods, VLOGP is based on linear free energy relationship (LFER) approach and employs information-rich electrotopological structure quantifiers derived solely from molecular topology. VLOGP, a robust and cross-validated model derived from accurately measured experimental log P values of 6675 diverse chemicals, has a coefficient of determination, R(2); Of 0.986. and a standard error of estimate of 0.20. When applied to the training set, the largest deviation observed between experimental and calculated log P was 0.42. VLOGP is different from other log P predictors in that its application domain, called Optimum Prediction Space (OPS), has been quantitatively defined, i.e., structures to which the model should not be applied for predicting log P can be identified. A computer-assisted implementation of this model within HDi's toxicity assessment software package, TOPKAT 3.0, automatically checks whether the submitted structure is inside the OPS or not. VLOGP was applied to a set of 113 chemicals not included in the training set. It was observed that for the,structures inside the OPS the average deviation between experimental and model-calculated log P values is 0.27, whereas the corresponding deviation for structures outside the OPS is 1.35. This demonstrates the necessity of identifying the structures to which a model is not applicable before accepting a model-based predicted log P value. For a set of 47 nucleosides, the performance of VLOGP was compared with that of four published log P predictors; a standard deviation of 0.33 was obtained with VLOGP, whereas the standard deviation from other log P predictors ranged between 0.46 and 1.20.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1134
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGY DRUG DESIGN
[2]  
BLOCK WJ, 1986, PARTITION COEFFICIEN
[3]   A NEW METHOD FOR THE ESTIMATION OF PARTITION-COEFFICIENT [J].
BODOR, N ;
GABANYI, Z ;
WONG, CK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1989, 111 (11) :3783-3786
[4]  
BROTO P, 1984, EUR J MED CHEM, V19, P71
[5]   COMPUTER-ASSISTED COMPUTATION OF PARTITION-COEFFICIENTS FROM MOLECULAR-STRUCTURES USING FRAGMENT CONSTANTS [J].
CHOU, JT ;
JURS, PC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1979, 19 (03) :172-178
[6]   PERMEABILITY OF PLANT CELLS [J].
COLLANDER, R .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1957, 8 :335-348
[7]  
DIXON WJ, 1988, BMDP STATISTICAL SOF
[8]   NEW SUBSTITUENT CONSTANT PI DERIVED FROM PARTITION COEFFICIENTS [J].
FUJITA, T ;
HANSCH, C ;
IWASA, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1964, 86 (23) :5175-&
[9]  
GHOSE A, 1986, J COMPUT CHEM, V4, P565
[10]  
GOMBAR VK, 1987, INDIAN J CHEM A, V26, P554