Specific gap junctions enhance the neuronal vulnerability to brain traumatic injury

被引:169
作者
Frantseva, MV
Kokarovtseva, L
Naus, CG
Carlen, PL
MacFabe, D
Velazquez, JLP
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Neurol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Dept Med Neurol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Toronto Western Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
关键词
trauma; gap junctions; antisense; electrophysiology; organotypic slices; cx43; knock-out;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00644.2002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Traumatic brain injury results in neuronal loss and associated neurological deficits. Although most research on the factors leading to trauma-induced damage focuses on synaptic or ionic mechanisms, the possible role of direct intercellular communication via gap junctions has remained unexplored. Gap junctions connect directly the cytoplasms of coupled cells; hence, they offer a way to propagate stress signals from cell to cell. We investigated the contribution of gap junctional communication (GJC) to cell death using an in vitro trauma model. The impact injury, induced by a weight dropped on the distal CA1 area of organotypic hippocampal slices, results in glutamate-dependent cell loss. The gap junctional blockers carbenoxolone and octanol decreased significantly post-traumatic cell death, measured by propidium iodide staining over a 72 hr period after the impact. Dye coupling in the pyramidal layers was enhanced immediately after the injury and decreased over the following 24 hr. To determine whether specific connexins were involved in the spread of trauma-induced cell death, we used organotypic slices from connexin43 (Cx43) knock-out mice, as well as acute knock-outs by incubation with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Simultaneous knockdown of two neuronal connexins resulted in significant neuroprotection. Slices from the null-mutant Cx43 mice, as well as the acute Cx43 knockdown, also showed decreased cell death after the impact. The gap junctional blockers alleviated the trauma-induced impairment of synaptic function as measured by electrophysiological field potential recordings. These results indicate that GJC enhances the cellular vulnerability to traumatic injury. Hence, specific gap junctions could be a novel target to reduce injury and secondary damage to the brain and maximize recovery from trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 653
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Methods to induce primary and secondary traumatic damage in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures [J].
Adamchik, Y ;
Frantseva, MV ;
Weisspapir, M ;
Carlen, PL ;
Velazquez, JLP .
BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2000, 5 (02) :153-158
[2]   Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from α-particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells [J].
Azzam, EI ;
de Toledo, SM ;
Little, JB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (02) :473-478
[3]  
Bani-Yaghoub M, 1999, DEV GENET, V24, P69, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<69::AID-DVG8>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-M
[5]   Dephosphorylation and intracellular redistribution of ventricular connexin43 during electrical uncoupling induced by ischemia [J].
Beardslee, MA ;
Lerner, DL ;
Tadros, PN ;
Laing, JG ;
Beyer, EC ;
Yamada, KA ;
Kléber, AG ;
Schuessler, RB ;
Saffitz, JE .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2000, 87 (08) :656-662
[6]  
Blanc EM, 1998, J NEUROCHEM, V70, P958
[7]  
BRICOLO AP, 1990, HDB CLIN NEUROLOGY, P181
[8]   Connections with connexins: The molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling [J].
Bruzzone, R ;
White, TW ;
Paul, DL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 238 (01) :1-27
[9]   Morphological astrocytic changes in complicated human brain trauma. A light and electron microscopic study [J].
Castejon, OJ .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (05) :409-427
[10]   Altered connexin expression after peripheral nerve injury [J].
Chandross, KJ ;
Kessler, JA ;
Cohen, RI ;
Simburger, E ;
Spray, DC ;
Bieri, P ;
Dermietzel, R .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 7 (06) :501-518