Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being

被引:67
作者
Brynjolfsson, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Collis, Avinash [1 ]
Eggers, Felix [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, NL-9747 AE Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
consumer surplus; digital goods; free goods; GDP; choice experiments;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1815663116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Gross domestic product (GDP) and derived metrics such as productivity have been central to our understanding of economic progress and well-being. In principle, changes in consumer surplus provide a superior, and more direct, measure of changes in wellbeing, especially for digital goods. In practice, these alternatives have been difficult to quantify. We explore the potential of massive online choice experiments to measure consumer surplus. We illustrate this technique via several empirical examples which quantify the valuations of popular digital goods and categories. Our examples include incentive-compatible discrete-choice experiments where online and laboratory participants receive monetary compensation if and only if they forgo goods for predefined periods. For example, the median user needed a compensation of about $48 to forgo Facebook for 1 mo. Our overall analyses reveal that digital goods have created large gains in well-being that are not reflected in conventional measures of GDP and productivity. By periodically querying a large, representative sample of goods and services, including those which are not priced in existing markets, changes in consumer surplus and other new measures of well-being derived from these online choice experiments have the potential for providing cost-effective supplements to the existing national income and product accounts.
引用
收藏
页码:7250 / 7255
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Anderson M., 2018, 11% of Americans don't use the internet. Who are they
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, 33 INT C INFORM SYST
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, J EC PERSP
  • [4] Bean C.R., 2016, Independent review of UK economic statistics
  • [5] MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD
    BECKER, GM
    DEGROOT, MH
    MARSCHAK, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03): : 226 - 232
  • [6] Byrne D, 2018, ACCOUNTING INNOVATIO
  • [7] Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice
    Carson, Richard T.
    Groves, Theodore
    List, John A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2014, 1 (1-2) : 171 - 207
  • [8] Center for the Digital Future at USC Annenberg, 2019, 2018 DIG FUT REP
  • [9] A day without a search engine: an experimental study of online and offline searches
    Chen, Yan
    Jeon, Grace YoungJoo
    Kim, Yong-Mi
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 17 (04) : 512 - 536
  • [10] Constine J., 2018, WHATSAPP HITS 1 5 BI