Assessing site vulnerability to phosphorus loss in an agricultural watershed

被引:152
作者
Sharpley, AN [1 ]
McDowell, RW [1 ]
Weld, JL [1 ]
Kleinman, PJA [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2001.2026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A P index was developed as a tool to rank agricultural fields on the basis of P loss vulnerability, helping to target remedial P management options within watersheds. We evaluated two approaches, a soil P threshold and components of a P index, by comparing site vulnerability estimates derived from these two approaches with measured runoff P losses in an agricultural watershed in Pennsylvania. Rainfall-surface runoff simulations (70 mm h(-1) for 30 min) were conducted on 57 sites representing the full range of soil P concentrations and management conditions found in the watershed. Each site was comprised of two, abutting 2-m(2) runoff plots, serving as duplicate observations. For sites that had not received P additions for at least six months prior to the study, Mehlich-3 P concentration was strongly associated with dissolved P concentrations (r(2) = 0.86) and losses (r(2) = 0.83) in surface runoff, as well as with total P concentration (r(2) = 0.80) and loss (r(2) = 0.74). However, Mehlich-3 P alone was poorly correlated with runoff P from sites receiving manure within three weeks prior to rainfall. The P index effectively described 88 and 83% of the variability in dissolved P concentrations and losses from all sites in the watershed, and P index ratings exhibited strong associations with total P concentrations (r(2) = 0.81) and losses (r(2) = 0.79). When site-specific observations were extrapolated to all fields in the watershed, management recommendations derived from a P index approach were less restrictive than those derived from the soil P threshold approach, better reflecting the low P loads exported from the watershed.
引用
收藏
页码:2026 / 2036
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, UN NAT STRAT AN FEED
[2]  
BEEGLE DB, 1999, AGRONOMY GUIDE 1999, P19
[3]  
BEEGLE DB, 1999, 1999 PENN STATE AGR, P42
[4]  
BOLINDER MA, 1998, AGRIENVIROMENT INDIC, P11
[5]  
Bremner J.M., 1982, Methods of Soil Analysis, VSecond, P595
[6]  
Carpenter SR, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P559, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Suggested classification of stream trophic state: Distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus [J].
Dodds, WK ;
Jones, JR ;
Welch, EB .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (05) :1455-1462
[9]  
EGHBALL B, 1999, 1999 ANN M ABSTR ASA, P30
[10]   Phosphorus management at the watershed scale: a modification of the phosphorus index [J].
Gburek, WJ ;
Sharpley, AN ;
Heathwaite, L ;
Folmar, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (01) :130-144