Efficacy and safety of ginsenoside-Rd for acute ischaemic stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II multicenter trial

被引:78
作者
Liu, X. [1 ]
Xia, J. [2 ]
Wang, L. [2 ]
Song, Y.
Yang, J. [3 ]
Yan, Y. [4 ]
Ren, H. [5 ]
Zhao, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Neurol, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Dept Stat, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Mil Command Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Univ Med Sci, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Affiliated Hosp 1, Kunming Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
ginsenoside-Rd; ischaemic stroke; randomized trial; GLYCINE ANTAGONIST GAVESTINEL; NEUROPROTECTION; SCALE; SURVIVAL; NXY-059;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02534.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ginsenoside-Rd is a selective competitive Ca2+ receptor antagonist. A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of ginsenoside-Rd in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. A total of 199 patients were randomized equally to receive a 14-day infusion of placebo (group B), ginsenoside-Rd 10 mg (group A) or ginsenoside-Rd 20 mg (group C). Primary end-points were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 15 days. Secondary end-points were NIHSS scores and the Barthel Index at 8 days, the Barthel Index and the modified Rankin scale at 15 days and 90 days. The safety end-points included serious and non-serious adverse events, laboratory values and vital signs. Analysis was by intention to treat. For the primary study outcome, there is significant difference amongst the three groups at 15 days in NIHSS scores (P = 0.0003). Comparing group A with B and group B with C, the difference in the mean for NIHSS was significant in statistics (P = 0.0004, P = 0.0009 respectively). This is no significant difference between group A and C (P = 0.9640). For the secondary study outcome, ginsenoside-Rd did not improve neurological functioning. Incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events was similar amongst the three groups. Ginsenoside-Rd may be of some benefit in acute ischaemic stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 575
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke - A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) [J].
Adams, HP ;
Davis, PH ;
Leira, EC ;
Chang, KC ;
Bendixen, BH ;
Clarke, WR ;
Woolson, RF ;
Hansen, MD .
NEUROLOGY, 1999, 53 (01) :126-131
[2]   Recommendations for clinical trial evaluation of acute stroke therapies - Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable II (STAIR-II) [J].
Albers, GW ;
Bogousslavsky, J ;
Bozik, MA ;
Brass, LM ;
Broderick, JP ;
Fisher, M ;
Goldstein, LB ;
Salazar-Grueso, E ;
Akitsuki, S ;
Aranko, K ;
Ashwood, T ;
Atkinson, RP ;
Bell, RD ;
Brott, TG ;
Cady, WJ ;
Caplan, LR ;
Coggins, S ;
Cramer, S ;
Cyrus, P ;
Dayno, J ;
Easton, JD ;
Elliott, PJ ;
Finklestein, SP ;
Furlan, AJ ;
Gamzu, E ;
Glasky, MS ;
Gordon, K ;
Gorelick, PB ;
Greenwood, DT ;
Grotta, JC ;
Gunn, K ;
Hachinski, V ;
Hacke, W ;
Hall, ED ;
Hsu, CY ;
Humphreys, DM ;
Ishikawa, H ;
Jacobs, AJ ;
Kaste, M ;
Koroshetz, WJ ;
Krams, M ;
Lauritano, AA ;
Leclerc, J ;
Lees, KR ;
Lesko, L ;
Levine, SR ;
Levy, DE ;
Li, FH ;
Lyden, PD ;
Masayasu, H .
STROKE, 2001, 32 (07) :1598-1606
[3]  
ANTONI D, 2005, CEREBROVASC DIS, V20, P135
[4]  
BLUMENTHAL M, 2001, ADV NURSE PRACT, V2, P26
[5]   Does clinical-CT 'mismatch' predict early response to treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator? [J].
Choi, John Y. ;
Pary, Jennifer K. ;
Alexandrov, Andrei V. ;
Molina, Carlos A. ;
Garami, Zsolt ;
Malkoff, Marc D. ;
Rubiera, Marta ;
Shaltoni, Hashem M. ;
Moye, Lemuel A. ;
Grotta, James C. .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 22 (5-6) :384-388
[6]   Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development [J].
Feinklestein, SP ;
Fisher, M ;
Furland, AJ ;
Goldstein, LB ;
Gorelick, PB ;
Kaste, M ;
Lees, KR ;
Traystman, RJ ;
Albers, GW ;
Anwer, UE ;
Ashwood, T ;
Barone, FC ;
Basta, SL ;
Bogousslavsky, J ;
Buchan, AM ;
Cady, WJ ;
Chan, PH ;
Clemens, JA ;
Cox, BF ;
Craddock, RE ;
Cramer, SC ;
del Zoppo, GJ ;
Dielrich, WD ;
Elliott, P ;
Faden, AI ;
Feuerstein, GZ ;
Ginsberg, MD ;
Gold, M ;
Greene, WL ;
Hall, ED ;
Hsu, CY ;
Hunter, AJ ;
Lai, M ;
Lesko, LM ;
Levy, DE ;
Li, FH ;
Locke, KW ;
Lodge, D ;
Lowe, D ;
Marcoux, FW ;
McCulloch, J ;
McDermott, J ;
Meibach, R ;
Messersmith, EK ;
Moseley, M ;
Moskowitz, MA ;
Mueller, AL ;
Munro, F ;
Nudo, RJ ;
Oeda, J .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (12) :2752-2758
[7]  
Goldstein LB, 2006, STROKE, V37, P1583, DOI 10.1161/01.STR.0000223048.70103.F1
[8]   Neuroprotection in acute ischaemic stroke: a tale of for whom the bell tolls? [J].
Gorelick, PB .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9219) :1925-1926
[9]   Ginsenoside-Rd from panax notoginseng blocks Ca2+ influx through receptor- and store-operated Ca2+ channels in vascular smooth muscle cells [J].
Guan, Yong-Yuan ;
Zhou, Jia-Guo ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Wang, Guan-Lei ;
Cai, Bing-Xiang ;
Hong, Liang ;
Qiu, Qin-Ying ;
He, Hua .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 548 (1-3) :129-136
[10]   Neuroprotection for acute ischaemic stroke: hope reignited [J].
Hankey, GJ .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2006, 5 (04) :287-288