An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters

被引:75
作者
Ahmad, S
Simonovic, SP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Inst Catastroph Loss Reduct, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
关键词
artificial neural networks; hydrograph estimation; meteorological parameters; Red River;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.032
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Conceptual models are considered to be the best choice for describing the runoff process in a watershed. However, enormous requirements for topographic, hydrologic and meteorological data and extensive time commitment for calibration of conceptual models (especially for distributed models) are often prohibitive factors in their practical applications. Artificial neural networks (ANN) can be an efficient way of modeling the runoff process in situations where explicit knowledge of the internal hydrologic processes is not available. An ANN is a flexible mathematical structure that is capable of identifying complex nonlinear relationships between input and output data sets. This paper presents the use of ANN for predicting the peak flow, timing and shape of runoff hydrograph, based on causal meteorological parameters. Antecedent precipitation index, melt index, winter precipitation, spring precipitation, and timing are the five input parameters used to develop runoff hydrograph for the Red River in Manitoba, Canada. A feed-forward artificial neural network is trained by using back-percolation algorithm. Peak flow, time of peak, width of hydrograph at 75 and 50% of peak, base flow, and timing of rising and falling sides of hydrograph are the output parameters obtained from the neural network model to describe a runoff hydrograph. The ANN generated results are evaluated using statistical parameters: percentage error and correlation. For six flood events for which forecasts are made the average absolute error in peak flow and time of peak is 6% and 4 days, respectively. Correlation between observed and simulated values of peak flow and time of peak is 0.99 and 0.88, respectively. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 251
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AHMAD S, 2001, DEV RUNOFF HYDROGRAP
[2]   A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting [J].
Anctil, F ;
Michel, C ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 286 (1-4) :155-167
[3]  
Anderson J., 1995, INTRO NEURAL NETWORK, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/3905.001.0001
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V119, P429
[5]  
Box G, 1976, TIME SERIES ANAL FOR
[6]   Performance of a virtual runoff hydrograph system [J].
Carriere, P ;
Mohaghegh, S ;
Gaskari, R .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1996, 122 (06) :421-427
[7]   PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR RUNOFF PREDICTION [J].
Elshorbagy, Amin ;
Simonovic, S. P. ;
Panu, U. S. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 5 (04) :424-427
[8]   RUNOFF FORECASTING USING RBF NETWORKS WITH OLS ALGORITHM [J].
Fernando, D. Achela K. ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 1998, 3 (03) :203-209
[9]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P124
[10]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P115