Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: A comparison of prostate quadrants

被引:35
作者
Sidhu, S [1 ]
Morris, WJ [1 ]
Spadinger, I [1 ]
Keyes, M [1 ]
Hilts, M [1 ]
Harrison, R [1 ]
Otto, K [1 ]
McKenzie, M [1 ]
Agranovich, A [1 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 52卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; postimplant dosimetry; treatment volume;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02672-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate postimplant dosimetry for different regions of the prostate gland in patients treated with transperineal (125)Iodine brachytherapy implants for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Two hundred eighty-four patients treated with permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy comprised the study population. A nonuniform, urethral-sparing algorithm was used to plan all patients. Prostate contours were outlined on postimplant CT images. Prostate volumes were then divided into four quadrants: anterior-superior quadrant (ASQ), posterior-superior quadrant (PSQ), anterior-inferior quadrant (AIQ), and posterior-inferior quadrant (PIQ). Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for the whole prostate and each quadrant. Results: The mean postimplant V-100 +/- 95% confidence (the percent prostate volume encompassed within the isodose surface comprising the prescription dose = 144 Gy) for the ASQ was 78.5 +/- 1.9, which was significantly lower than that of the PSQ, AIQ, and PIQ in which the V-100 +/- 95% confidence values were 94.9 +/- 0.8, 92.6 +/- 1.2, and 98.7 +/- 0.3, respectively. The mean V-100 +/- 95% confidence for the whole prostate was 90.4 +/- 0.8. Mean values for V-150 and D-90 (the minimum dose in Gy received by 90% of the target volume) for the four quadrants and the whole prostate showed similar results. Conclusions: Underdosed areas of the planning target volume (PTV), if present, were largely confined to the ASQ, which received a significantly lower dose, on average, compared to the other three quadrants of the prostate. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 552
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy [J].
Bice, WS ;
Prestidge, BR ;
Grimm, PD ;
Friedland, JL ;
Feygelman, V ;
Roach, M ;
Prete, JL ;
Dubois, DF ;
Blasko, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04) :921-927
[2]  
Blasko, 1993, Semin Radiat Oncol, V3, P240, DOI 10.1016/S1053-4296(05)80121-3
[3]  
BUCCI J, IN PRESS J BRACHYTHE
[4]   Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy [J].
Butler, WM ;
Merrick, GS ;
Lief, JH ;
Dorsey, AT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (02) :381-392
[5]   Defining the implant treatment volume for patients with low risk prostate cancer: Does the anterior base need to be treated? [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Davis, A ;
Vargas, SO ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Richie, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (03) :587-590
[6]   TREATMENT-RELATED SYMPTOMS DURING THE 1ST YEAR FOLLOWING TRANSPERINEAL I-125 PROSTATE IMPLANTATION [J].
KLEINBERG, L ;
WALLNER, K ;
ROY, J ;
ZELEFSKY, M ;
ARTERBERY, VE ;
FUKS, Z ;
HARRISON, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (04) :985-990
[7]   NORMAL HISTOLOGY OF THE PROSTATE [J].
MCNEAL, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1988, 12 (08) :619-633
[8]   STAGE A VERSUS STAGE-B ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - MORPHOLOGICAL COMPARISON AND BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE [J].
MCNEAL, JE ;
PRICE, HM ;
REDWINE, EA ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (01) :61-65
[9]   ZONAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - CORRELATION WITH HISTOLOGIC PATTERN AND DIRECTION OF SPREAD [J].
MCNEAL, JE ;
REDWINE, EA ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1988, 12 (12) :897-906
[10]   Optimal placement of radioisotopes for permanent prostate implants [J].
Narayana, V ;
Roberson, PL ;
Winfield, RJ ;
Kessler, ML ;
McLaughlin, PW .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) :457-460