Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a 'scientific-economic' framework

被引:40
作者
Chang, YC
Chen, MH
Hua, MS
Yang, PY
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Grad Inst Technol & Innovat Management, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chi Nan Univ, Dept Int Business Studies, Puli 545, Nantou, Taiwan
[4] Cent Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Int Business Dept, Taichung 406, Taiwan
关键词
higher education institution; academic innovation; patenting and licensing; university-industry partnership; firm incubation;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the passage of the Science and Technology Basic Law in 1999, Taiwanese universities have taken a more "scientific-economic" approach to protect and commercialize their research. This research mainly examines innovation activities such as patenting, licensing, and incubated startups in the context of Taiwanese higher education institutions (HEIs). The "scientific-economic" framework used to analyze the strategic aspects influencing these academic innovations includes (1) intellectual property managerial capabilities, (2) the strength of external industrial partnerships, (3) the university entrepreneurial orientation, and (4) government research policy. Four hypotheses were developed. Data were collected via a questionnaire with all 122 HEIs in Taiwan surveyed. The research reveals that the aspects of intellectual property managerial capability, HEI-industry partnerships, and academic entrepreneurial orientation are useful to distinguish the university's innovation performance on patent grants, licensing incomes, and firm incubation. Also, government support on research plays a moderating role in academic innovation. Managerial and policy implications for managing innovation effectively in universities were drawn. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 213
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax [J].
Beath, J ;
Owen, RF ;
Poyago-Theotoky, J ;
Ulph, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 21 (09) :1301-1322
[2]  
BORDT M, 1999, SURVEY INTELLECTUAL
[3]  
COX D, 1999, GOVT LAB TRANSITION
[4]   Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? [J].
Di Gregorio, D ;
Shane, S .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) :209-227
[5]   The importance of public research institutes in innovative networks - Empirical results from the metropolitan innovation systems Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna [J].
Diez, JR .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2000, 8 (04) :451-463
[6]  
DRUILHE C, 2001, NEW TECHNOLOGY BASED, P175
[7]  
Duke C. R., 1995, J PRODUCT BRAND MANA, V4, P5
[8]   Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university [J].
Etzkowitz, H .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :109-121
[9]  
Etzkowitz H., 1997, U GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE E
[10]  
Friedman J., 2003, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V28, P17, DOI [10.1023/a:1021674618658, DOI 10.1023/A:1021674618658]