A comparative analysis of global, national, and state red lists for threatened amphibians in Brazil

被引:15
作者
Morais, Alessandro R. [1 ]
Braga, Rosana Talita [1 ]
Bastos, Rogerio P. [2 ]
Brito, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Inst Ciencias Biol, Programa Posgrad Ecol & Evolucao, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Goias, Inst Ciencias Biol, Dept Ecol, Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
Conservation policy; Endemic species; IUCN; Regional red list; EXTINCTION RISK; CONSERVATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-012-0322-2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The knowledge about the conservation status of species is an important data for conservation biology. Therefore, threatened species lists are a powerful tool for conservation planning and prioritization. Our objective is to compare the global, the national and state red lists of amphibians in Brazil. Threatened species were categorized according to their listing in one or several of these lists. We analyzed for true inconsistencies across lists in order to evaluate practical consequences of such incongruences on amphibian conservation in Brazil. We recorded a total of 61 threatened amphibian species in Brazil (across all red lists). Only one species, Phrynomedusa fimbriata, was listed as Extinct (both in IUCN, Brazil and So Paulo lists). A total of eleven endemic species are listed as threatened by the global red list, but do not appear in Brazil's national red list, which represent an inconsistence among these lists. Besides that, the threat category of Thoropa lutzi and Thoropa petropolitana, two endemic species, differ among both lists, which also represents a problem between both lists. These mismatches may be due to several reasons such as different interpretation of the criteria; different methodologies used; different data availability on species; differences in the dates of assessments processes; the assessors' attitudes to uncertainty; outdated red lists. Harmonization among red lists permits a better picture of threatened amphibian diversity across scales and to develop global, national and state plans to complement conservation actions in order to maximize the chance of success of these initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:2633 / 2640
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty [J].
Akçakaya, HR ;
Ferson, S ;
Burgman, MA ;
Keith, DA ;
Mace, GM ;
Todd, CR .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) :1001-1013
[2]  
Aleixo A, 2006, DISCUSSAO ELABORACAO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
[4]   Extinction risk assessments at the population and species level: implications for amphibian conservation [J].
Becker, Carlos Guilherme ;
Loyola, Rafael Dias .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (09) :2297-2304
[5]   Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians [J].
Becker, Carlos Guilherme ;
Fonseca, Carlos Roberto ;
Baptista Haddad, Celio Fernando ;
Batista, Romulo Fernandes ;
Prado, Paulo Inacio .
SCIENCE, 2007, 318 (5857) :1775-1777
[6]  
Bergallo H G., 2000, A fauna ameacada de extincao do estado do Rio de Janeiro
[7]  
Bressan P. M., 2009, Fauna ameacada de extincao no estado de Sao Paulo: Vertebrados, P648
[8]   Overcoming the Linnean shortfall: Data deficiency and biological survey priorities [J].
Brito, Daniel .
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 11 (08) :709-713
[9]   How similar are national red lists and the IUCN Red List? [J].
Brito, Daniel ;
Grace Ambal, Ruth ;
Brooks, Thomas ;
De Silva, Naamal ;
Foster, Matthew ;
Hao, Wang ;
Hilton-Taylor, Craig ;
Paglia, Adriano ;
Paul Rodriguez, Jon ;
Vicente Rodriguez, Jose .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (05) :1154-1158
[10]  
Drummond GM, 2008, LISTA VERMELHAS ESPE