Evaluation of urban ecological carrying capacity: a case study of Beijing, China

被引:30
作者
Xu, Linyu [1 ]
Kang, Peng [1 ]
Wei, Jinjin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS AND ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION (ISEIS 2010) | 2010年 / 2卷
关键词
Urban ecosystem; carrying capacity; gray relevant degree; Beijing;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.199
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In process of global rapid urbanization, it becomes a hot issue that whether urban ecosystems can sustain the high intensity of the human activities and eliminate impact that socio-economic development induced or not, therefore the evaluation of urban ecosystem carrying capacity has become a significant point of urban ecology. Currently the theory and method of urban ecological carrying capacity can be categorized into three main patterns by represented characteristics: population carrying capacity, ecological footprint and relative carrying capacity. The relative carrying capacity in urban ecosystem can be defined as a potential ability, which can show the sustainable developing trend via comparison between ecological pressures and supportive ability. In this paper, an evaluation method of urban relative carrying capacity based on grey relevant degree is proposed and applied with Tongzhou district of Beijing, China as case study. The results indicated that accompanied with the improvement of urbanization ratio, the region comprehensive carrying capacity had been enhanced from 2000 to 2004 year, but its development in planning year is not sustainable and might create some detrimental impacts on urban ecosystem if it keeps the current developing mode. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1873 / 1880
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   An economic-ecological model of urban growth and urban externalities: empirical evidence from Italy [J].
Capello, R ;
Faggian, A .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (02) :181-198
[2]  
Gao J X., 2001, THEORETICAL EXPLORAT
[3]   Environmental impacts of urban growth from an integrated dynamic perspective: A case study of Shenzhen, South China [J].
Gueneralp, Burak ;
Seto, Karen C. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (04) :720-735
[4]  
He W., 1999, MATH STAT MANAGEMENT, V1999, P25
[5]  
Huang Q., 2005, RESOURCES CONSERVATI, P24
[6]   Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the Ecological Footprint [J].
Jin, Wei ;
Xu, Linyu ;
Yang, Zhifeng .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (12) :2938-2949
[7]  
Linyu Xu, 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE '08), P4400
[8]   The relationship between settlement population size and sustainable development measured by two sustainability metrics [J].
O'Regan, Bernadette ;
Morrissey, John ;
Foley, Walter ;
Moles, Richard .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (03) :169-178
[10]   Monetary analysis: turning a blind eye on sustainability [J].
Rees, WE ;
Wackernagel, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (01) :47-52