On the use of biosurfactants for the removal of heavy metals from oil-contaminated soil

被引:65
作者
Mulligan, CN
Yong, RN
Gibbs, BF
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Univ Wales, Cardiff Sch Engn, Geoenvironm Engn Res Ctr, Cardiff CF2 1XH, S Glam, Wales
[3] Bivan Consultants Inc, Environm Div, Montreal, PQ H4B 1N6, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS | 1999年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ep.670180120
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The feasibility of using biodegradable biosurfactants to remove heavy metals from an oil-contaminated soil was evaluated by batch washes with surfactin, a rhamnolipid and a sophorolipid. The soil contained 890 mg/kg of zinc and 420 mg/kg of copper with a 12.6% oil and grease content. Highest levels of zinc removal were obtained using 12% rhamnolipid (19.5% of the zinc) and 4% sophorolipid/0.7% HCl (15.8% of the zinc). Highest copper removal rates were achieved (greater than 25%) with 12% rhamnolipid or with 2% rhamnolipid/1% NaOH or 0.25% surfactin/1% NaOH. A series of five batch washes removed 70% of the copper with 0.1% surfactin/1% NaOH while 4% sophorolipid/0.7% HCl was able to remove 100% of the zinc. Sequential extraction procedures showed that the carbonate and oxide fractions accounted for over 90% of the zinc present in the soil and the organic fraction in the soil constituted over 70% of the copper. Sequential extraction of the soil after washing with the surfaction or rhamnolipid (both with 1% NaOH) indicated that these surfactants could remove the organically-bound copper and that the sophorolipid with acid could remove the carbonate and oxide -bound zinc. In conclusion, the results clearly indicated the feasibility of removing the metals with the anionic biosurfactants tested even though the exchangeable metal fractions were very low.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 54
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[2]  
Cameron R. E., 1992, Metals. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/4-91/029, V1
[3]  
Chhabra R., 1975, P INT CLAY C, P439
[4]   SOIL CLEANUP BY SURFACTANT WASHING .1. LABORATORY RESULTS AND MATHEMATICAL-MODELING [J].
CLARKE, AN ;
PLUMB, PD ;
SUBRAMANYAN, TK ;
WILSON, DJ .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 26 (03) :301-343
[5]   PRODUCTION OF A BIOSURFACTANT FROM TORULOPSIS-BOMBICOLA [J].
COOPER, DG ;
PADDOCK, DA .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 47 (01) :173-176
[6]  
DEZABALA E, 1982, SOC PET ENG J, V2, P245
[7]  
ELLIS WD, 1985, EPA600285129
[8]   THE INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHATE-METABOLISM ON BIOSURFACTANT PRODUCTION BY PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA [J].
MULLIGAN, CN ;
MAHMOURIDES, G ;
GIBBS, BF .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1989, 12 (3-4) :199-210
[9]  
MULLIGAN CN, 1990, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V47, P23
[10]  
NASH J, 1987, SURFACTANT ENHANCED