Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays

被引:14
作者
Esfandiari, Rajab [1 ]
Myford, Carol M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Imam Khomeini Int Univ, Dept English Language, Fac Humanities, Qazvin, Iran
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Educ, Dept Educ Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Writing assessment; Self-assessment; Peer-assessment; Rater effects; Rating scales; FEEDBACK; STUDENTS; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We compared three assessor types (self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors) to determine whether they differed in the levels of severity they exercised when rating essays. We analyzed the ratings of 194 assessors who evaluated 188 essays that students enrolled in two state-run universities in Iran wrote. The assessors employed a 6-point analytic scale to provide ratings on 15 assessment criteria. The results of our analysis showed that of the three assessor types, teacher assessors were the most severe while self-assessors were the most lenient, although there was a great deal of variability in the levels of severity that assessors within each type exercised. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 131
页数:21
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students' writing [J].
Andrade, Heidi L. ;
Du, Ying ;
Mycek, Kristina .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2010, 17 (02) :199-214
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IELTS COLLECTED PAPE
[3]  
[Anonymous], MODERN LANGUAGE J
[4]  
[Anonymous], LANGUAGE TESTING
[5]  
[Anonymous], 19 ANN C APPL LING A
[6]  
[Anonymous], FACETS VERSION 3 68
[7]  
[Anonymous], 16 TOEFL IBT ED TEST
[8]  
[Anonymous], ED STUDIES
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INTRO RASCH MEASUREM
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, THESIS U TECHNOLOGY