Asthma Control Test: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists

被引:976
作者
Schatz, M
Sorkness, CA
Li, JT
Marcus, P
Murray, JJ
Nathan, RA
Kosinski, M
Pendergraft, TB
Jhingran, P
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, San Diego, CA 92111 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Mayo Med Ctr, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Nassau Chest Phys PC, Great Neck, NY USA
[5] Vanderbilt Asthma Sinus Allergy Program, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Asthma & Allergy Associates & Res Ctr, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[7] QualityMetr Inc, Lincoln, NE USA
[8] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
asthma control assessment; Asthma Control Test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.011
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The development of the Asthma Control Test (ACT), a short, simple, patient-based tool for identifying patients with poorly controlled asthma, was recently described in patients under the routine care or an asthma specialist. Objectives: We sought to evaluate the reliability and validity of the ACT in a longitudinal study of asthmatic patients new to the care of an asthma specialist. Methods: Patients (n = 313) completed the ACT and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at 2 physician visits (4-12 weeks apart). Pulmonary function was measured, and asthma specialists rated asthma control. Results: Internal consistency reliability of the ACT was 0.85 (baseline) and 0.79 (follow-up). Test-retest reliability was 0.77. Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between baseline ACT scores and baseline specialists' ratings of asthma control (r = 0.52, P <.001) and ACQ scores (r = -0.89, P <.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated, with significant (P <.001) differences in mean ACT scores across patients differing in asthma control, pulmonary function, and treatment recommendation. Responsiveness of the ACT to changes in asthma control and lung function was demonstrated with significant correlations between changes in ACT scores and changes in specialists' ratings (r = 0.44. P <.001). ACQ scores (r = -0.69, P <.001), and percent predicted FEV1 values (r = 0.29, P <.001). An ACT score of 19 or less provided optimum balance of sensitivity (71%) and specificity (71%) for detecting uncontrolled asthma. Conclusions: The ACT is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time in patients new to the care of asthma specialists. A cutoff score of 19 or less identifies patients with poorly controlled asthma. Clinical implications: In a clinical setting the ACT should he a useful tool to help physicians identify patients with uncontrolled asthma and facilitate their ability to follow patients' progress with treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 556
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM LUNG ASS EP ST, 2005, TRENDS ASTHM MORB MO
[2]   Predicting children's quality of life in an asthma clinical trial: What do children's reports tell us? [J].
Annett, RD ;
Bender, BG ;
Lapidus, J ;
DuHamel, TR ;
Lincoln, A .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 139 (06) :854-861
[3]  
*CDCP, 2004, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V53, P145
[4]   Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire [J].
Juniper, EF ;
Svensson, K ;
Mörk, AC ;
Ståhl, E .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 99 (05) :553-558
[5]   Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control [J].
Juniper, EF ;
O'Byrne, PM ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Ferrie, PJ ;
King, DR .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 14 (04) :902-907
[6]  
Kerlinger F.N., 1973, Foundations of behavioral research
[7]   Compliance with National Asthma Management Guidelines and specialty care - A health maintenance organization experience [J].
Legorreta, AP ;
Christian-Herman, J ;
O'Connor, RD ;
Hasan, MM ;
Evans, R ;
Leung, KM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (05) :457-464
[8]   A SCALE FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN ADULTS WITH ASTHMA [J].
MARKS, GB ;
DUNN, SM ;
WOOLCOCK, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (05) :461-472
[9]   Compliance with US asthma management guidelines and specialty care: a regional variation or national concern? [J].
Meng, YY ;
Leung, KM ;
Berkbigler, D ;
Halbert, RJ ;
Legorreta, AP .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1999, 5 (02) :213-221
[10]   Asthma care practices, perceptions, and beliefs of Chicago-area asthma specialists [J].
Moy, JN ;
Grant, EN ;
Turner-Roan, K ;
Li, T ;
Weiss, KB .
CHEST, 1999, 116 (04) :154S-162S