Mastectomy or breast conserving surgery? Factors affecting type of surgical treatment for breast cancer - a classification tree approach

被引:34
作者
Martin, MA [1 ]
Meyricke, R [1 ]
O'Neill, T [1 ]
Roberts, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Finance & Appl Stat, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-6-98
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A critical choice facing breast cancer patients is which surgical treatment mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) - is most appropriate. Several studies have investigated factors that impact the type of surgery chosen, identifying features such as place of residence, age at diagnosis, tumor size, socio-economic and racial/ethnic elements as relevant. Such assessment of "propensity" is important in understanding issues such as a reported under-utilisation of BCS among women for whom such treatment was not contraindicated. Using Western Australian (WA) data, we further examine the factors associated with the type of surgical treatment for breast cancer using a classification tree approach. This approach deals naturally with complicated interactions between factors, and so allows flexible and interpretable models for treatment choice to be built that add to the current understanding of this complex decision process. Methods: Data was extracted from the WA Cancer Registry on women diagnosed with breast cancer in WA from 1990 to 2000. Subjects' treatment preferences were predicted from covariates using both classification trees and logistic regression. Results: Tumor size was the primary determinant of patient choice, subjects with tumors smaller than 20 mm in diameter preferring BCS. For subjects with tumors greater than 20 mm in diameter factors such as patient age, nodal status, and tumor histology become relevant as predictors of patient choice. Conclusion: Classification trees perform as well as logistic regression for predicting patient choice, but are much easier to interpret for clinical use. The selected tree can inform clinicians' advice to patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DANGERS OF USING OPTIMAL CUTPOINTS IN THE EVALUATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
LAUSEN, B ;
SAUERBREI, W ;
SCHUMACHER, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (11) :829-835
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN PRACT GUID MAN
[3]   Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Potosky, AL ;
Harlan, LC ;
Nayfield, SG ;
Kessler, LG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (11) :716-726
[4]  
Brieman L., 1984, WADSWORTH INC
[5]   Breast cancer in young Asian women: Study on survival [J].
Foo, CS ;
Su, D ;
Chong, CK ;
Chng, HC ;
Tay, KH ;
Low, SC ;
Tan, SM .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (07) :566-572
[6]  
Friedman J., 2001, The elements of statistical learning, V1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5
[7]   Access to breast-conserving treatment: are surgeons responsible? [J].
Furnival, C .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (06) :402-403
[8]   Medical record linkage in Australia: This is as good as it gets [J].
Giles, GG .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (05) :259-259
[9]   The propensity score in the analysis of therapeutic studies [J].
Graf, E .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 39 (03) :297-307
[10]   Unequal access to breast-conserving surgery in Western Australia 1982-2000 [J].
Hall, SE ;
Holman, CDJ ;
Hendrie, DV ;
Spilsbury, K .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (06) :413-419