Ultrasound Improves the Success Rate of a Sural Nerve Block at the Ankle

被引:39
作者
Redborg, Kirsten E. [1 ]
Sites, Brian D. [1 ,2 ]
Chinn, Christopher D. [1 ]
Gallagher, John D. [1 ]
Ball, Perty A. [1 ,3 ]
Antonakakis, John G. [1 ]
Beach, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
关键词
FOOT; FOREFOOT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181933f09
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: During ankle block performance, anesthetizing the sural nerve is important for generating complete anesthesia of the lateral aspect of the foot. We hypothesized that an Ultrasound-guided perivascular approach, utilizing the lesser saphenous vein as a reference, would prove more successful than a conventional approach based on surface landmarks. Methods: Eighteen healthy volunteers were prospectively randomized into this controlled and blinded study. Each subject was placed prone and the right ankle was randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided perivascular sural nerve block (group US) or a traditional landmark-based sural nerve block (group TRAD). The subject's left ankle then received the alternate approach. The ultrasound technique relied on injecting local anesthetic circumferentially around the lesser saphenous vein. All blocks were performed with 5 mL of 3% chloroprocaine. We evaluated sensory block to ice and pinprick. Secondary outcome variables included performance times, number of needle passes, participant satisfaction, and presence of any complications. Results: At the midfoot position, testing at 10 minutes after block placement revealed a loss of sensation to ice in 94% (complete in 78% and partial in 16%) in the US group versus 56% in the TRAD group (complete in 28%, partial in 28%) (P < .01). Complete loss of sensation to ice persisted in 33% of the US group as compared with 6% in the TRAD group at 60 Minutes (P < .05). A similar pattern was observed when the blocks were tested with pinprick. Ultrasound-guided blocks took longer to perform on aver-age than the traditional blocks (mean difference of 102 seconds, P < .001). The ultrasound block was subjectively felt to be denser by 88% of the subjects (P = .00 1). Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance using the lesser saphenous vein as a reference point results in a more complete and longer lasting sural nerve block than does a traditional approach Using Surface landmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BROWN DL, 1999, ATLAS REGIONAL ANEST, P131
[2]  
COUSINS MJ, 1998, NEURAL BLOCKADE CLIN, P389
[3]  
DEMAY J, 2001, REG ANESTH PAIN MED, V26, P504
[4]  
Hollinshead WH, 1969, ANATOMY SURG, VIII, P761
[5]  
KOFOED H, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P97
[6]   Sonography for saphenous nerve block near the adductor canal [J].
Krombach, Jens ;
Gray, Andrew T. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (04) :369-370
[7]   Anatomical variations of the cutaneous innervation patterns of the sural nerve on the dorsum of the foot [J].
Madhavi, C ;
Isaac, B ;
Antoniswamy, B ;
Holla, SJ .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2005, 18 (03) :206-209
[8]  
McCUTCHEON R., 1965, CAN ANAESTH SOC J, V12, P465, DOI 10.1007/BF03004408
[9]   LATERAL POPLITEAL SCIATIC-NERVE BLOCK COMPARED WITH ANKLE BLOCK FOR ANALGESIA FOLLOWING FOOT SURGERY [J].
MCLEOD, DH ;
WONG, DHW ;
VAGHADIA, H ;
CLARIDGE, RJ ;
MERRICK, PM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (09) :765-769
[10]   Accompanying arteries of the lesser saphenous vein and sural nerve: Anatomic study and its clinical applications [J].
Nakajima, H ;
Imanishi, N ;
Fukuzumi, S ;
Minabe, T ;
Fukui, Y ;
Miyasaka, T ;
Kodama, T ;
Aiso, S ;
Fujino, T .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (01) :104-120