A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis)

被引:86
作者
Nickel, JC
Downey, J
Pontari, MA
Shoskes, DA
Zeitlin, SI
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Florida, Weston, FL USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
prostatitis; chronic nonbacterial prostatitis; chronic pelvic pain syndrome; finasteride; 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04766.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS) compared with placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men (76) with category IIIA CPPS enrolled in four North American prostatitis research centres were randomized after a 2-week placebo run-in to finasteride or placebo for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was a subjective overall assessment (SOA); the secondary efficacy variables included the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and safety data. Patients were assessed at screening, baseline (after the 2-week placebo run-in), 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Sixty-four patients had at least one assessment on medication (31 placebo, 33 finasteride); 75% of the finasteride and 54% of the placebo group had at least a mild improvement (defined as > 25% improvement in SOA), and 44% and 27%, respectively, a moderate or marked improvement (>50% improvement in SOA). The trend was similar in the NIH-CPSI scores. Five patients in the finasteride and seven in the placebo group reported medication-related adverse events. CONCLULSION This randomized placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that finasteride was of benefit for some men with category IIIA CPPS, but the results do not justify recommending finasteride as monotherapy, except for men who also have benign prostatic hyperplasia. A larger, properly powered study, possibly evaluating combination with other therapies or specifically in men with prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia, is required to confirm any clinical benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 995
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Terazosin therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized, placebo controlled trial [J].
Cheah, PY ;
Liong, ML ;
Yuen, KH ;
Teh, CL ;
Khor, T ;
Yang, JR ;
Yap, HW ;
Krieger, JN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) :592-596
[2]   Acupuncture ameliorates symptoms in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome [J].
Chen, R ;
Nickel, JC .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (06) :1156-1159
[3]   Diagnosis and treatment of chronic abacterial prostatitis: A systematic review [J].
Collins, MM ;
MacDonald, R ;
Wilt, TJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 133 (05) :367-381
[4]  
EVANS DTP, 1999, PROSTATITIS, P293
[5]  
Golio G., 1997, 49 ANN M NE SECT AM, P128
[6]   Chronic prostatic pain - A new treatment option with finasteride? [J].
Holm, M ;
Meyhoff, HH .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :213-215
[7]  
Johansen TEB, 1998, EUR UROL, V34, P457
[8]   A prospective, 1-year trial using saw palmetto versus finasteride in the treatment of category III prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome [J].
Kaplan, SA ;
Volpe, MA ;
Te, AE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) :284-288
[9]   INTRA-PROSTATIC URINARY REFLUX - AN ETIOLOGICAL FACTOR IN ABACTERIAL PROSTATITIS [J].
KIRBY, RS ;
LOWE, D ;
BULTITUDE, MI ;
SHUTTLEWORTH, KED .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 54 (06) :729-731
[10]   Does the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome differ from nonbacterial prostatitis and prostatodynia? [J].
Krieger, JN ;
Jacobs, RR ;
Ross, SO .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1554-1558