Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH

被引:50
作者
Rickman, L
Fiegler, H
Carter, NP
Bobrow, M
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Med Genet, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[2] Wellcome Trust Sanger Inst, Cambridge CB10 1SA, England
关键词
prenatal; karyotype; aneuploidy; comparative genomic hybridisation; microarray;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.03.003
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Microscopic karyotype analysis of cultured cells has been regarded as the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis for over 30 years. Since the first application of this technique to prenatal testing in the early 1970's, this procedure has proved to be highly reliable for identifying chromosome copy number abnormalities (aneuploidy) and large structural rearrangements in foetal cells obtained invasively by either amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Recognising the need for more rapid testing methods which do not require cell culture, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) have been introduced to this field in order to answer specific diagnostic questions. However, both FISH and QF-PCR suffer the disadvantage in that they are difficult to scale to a comprehensive, genome-wide screen. Array-comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) in contrast is a comprehensive, genome-wide screening strategy for detecting DNA copy number imbalances which can be rapid, less labour-intensive than karyotype banding analysis and is highly amenable to automation. Array-CGH has the potential to be used for prenatal diagnosis and may address many of the limitations of both conventional microscopic cytogenetic analyses and the more recently employed rapid-screening strategies. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 240
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Prenatal detection of chromosome disorders by QF-PCR [J].
Adinolfi, M ;
Sherlock, J .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9287) :1030-1031
[2]   Genomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer [J].
Albertson, DG ;
Pinkel, D .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2003, 12 :R145-R152
[3]   Diagnosis of aneuploidy in arrival, paraffin-embedded pregnancy-loss tissues by comparative genomic hybridization [J].
Bell, KA ;
Van Deerlin, PG ;
Feinberg, RF ;
du Manoir, S ;
Haddad, BR .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (02) :374-379
[4]  
Carey JC, 1999, AM J MED GENET, V89, P7, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990326)89:1<7::AID-AJMG4>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-R
[6]   CHEMICAL DIFFERENTIATION ALONG METAPHASE CHROMOSOMES [J].
CASPERSSON, T ;
FARBER, S ;
FOLEY, GE ;
KUDYNOWSKI, J ;
MODEST, EJ ;
SIMONSSON, E ;
WAGH, U ;
ZECH, L .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1968, 49 (01) :219-+
[7]  
Chen CK, 2003, J REPROD MED, V48, P391
[8]   Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR.: Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples [J].
Cirigliano, V ;
Voglino, G ;
Cañadas, MP ;
Marongiu, A ;
Ejarque, M ;
Ordoñez, E ;
Plaja, A ;
Massobrio, M ;
Todros, T ;
Fuster, C ;
Campogrande, M ;
Egozcue, J ;
Adinolfi, M .
MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 10 (11) :839-846
[9]   DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones [J].
Fiegler, H ;
Carr, P ;
Douglas, EJ ;
Burford, DC ;
Hunt, S ;
Smith, J ;
Vetrie, D ;
Gorman, P ;
Tomlinson, IPM ;
Carter, NP .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2003, 36 (04) :361-374
[10]   Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome [J].
Iafrate, AJ ;
Feuk, L ;
Rivera, MN ;
Listewnik, ML ;
Donahoe, PK ;
Qi, Y ;
Scherer, SW ;
Lee, C .
NATURE GENETICS, 2004, 36 (09) :949-951