Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes

被引:573
作者
de Groot, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6700 DD Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
landscape functions; ecosystem goods and services; ecological and economic valuation; conflict analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In order to reconcile landscape conservation with changing demands on land use and natural resources, it is essential that the ecological. socio-cultural and economic values of the landscape be fully taken into account in planning and decision-making., This paperpresents a comprehensive framework for integrated assessment of ecological services and socio-economic benefits of natural and semi-natural ecosystems and landscapes. The framework can be applied at different scale levels to different ecosystems or landscape-units and basically consists of three steps: (1) Function-analysis: translates ecological complexity into a limited number of ecosystem (or landscape) functions, which, in turn, provide a range of goods and services; (2) Function valuation: includes ecological. socio-cultural and economic valuation methods; and (3) Conflict analysis: to facilitate the application of function-analysis and valuation at different scale levels, it is important to integrate analytical valuation methods with stakeholder participation techniques. The framework presented in this paper facilitates the structured assessment of the (total) value of the goods and services provided by a specific area (landscape) and to analyze the costs and benefits involved in trade-offs between various land use options. The last section of this paper gives some conclusions and recommendations for application-possibilities of function-analysis and valuation to achieve more sustainable landscape use and maintenance of our "natural capital". (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 186
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WETLANDS MARKET INTE
  • [2] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953
  • [3] Barbier EB, 1998, AMBIO, V27, P434
  • [4] BORRINIFEYERABE.G, 2000, CO MANAGEMENT NATURA
  • [5] Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model
    Boumans, R
    Costanza, R
    Farley, J
    Wilson, MA
    Portela, R
    Rotmans, J
    Villa, F
    Grasso, M
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) : 529 - 560
  • [6] Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective
    Chiesura, A
    de Groot, R
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 44 (2-3) : 219 - 231
  • [7] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [8] Ecology -: The value of nature and the nature of value
    Daily, GC
    Söderqvist, T
    Aniyar, S
    Arrow, K
    Dasgupta, P
    Ehrlich, PR
    Folke, C
    Jansson, A
    Jansson, BO
    Kautsky, N
    Levin, S
    Lubchenco, J
    Mäler, KG
    Simpson, D
    Starrett, D
    Tilman, D
    Walker, B
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5478) : 395 - 396
  • [9] Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital
    De Groot, R
    Van der Perk, J
    Chiesura, A
    van Vliet, A
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 44 (2-3) : 187 - 204
  • [10] De Groot R. S., 2000, Implementing ecological integrity. Nato science series, V1, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3_13, 10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3_13]