Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism

被引:47
作者
Brigandt, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hist & Philosophy Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/377409
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Marc Ereshefsky argues that pluralism about species suggests that the species concept is not theoretically useful. It is to be abandoned in favor of several concrete species concepts that denote real categories. While accepting species pluralism, the present paper rejects eliminativism about the species category. Based on the idea that the species concept is a so-called investigative kind concept, it is argued that the species concept is important and that it is possible to make sense of a general species concept despite the existence of different concrete species concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1316
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Populations
[2]  
Atran S., 1990, COGNITIVE FDN NATURA
[3]  
Boyd R, 1999, SPECIES, P141
[4]  
BRIGANDT I, UNPUB ROLE CONCEPT P
[5]  
BRIGANDT I, UNPUB CONCEPTUAL CHA
[6]  
de Queiroz K, 1999, SPECIES, P49
[7]  
Dupre J., 1993, Disembodying Women: Perspective on Pregnancy and the Unborn
[8]   Species pluralism and anti-realism [J].
Ereshefsky, M .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1998, 65 (01) :103-120
[9]   ELIMINATIVE PLURALISM [J].
ERESHEFSKY, M .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1992, 59 (04) :671-690
[10]  
GHISELIN M T, 1987, Biology and Philosophy, V2, P127