A Bibliometric Mapping of the Structure of STEM Education using Co-Word Analysis

被引:73
作者
Assefa, Shimelis G. [1 ]
Rorissa, Abebe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Dept Res Methods & Informat Sci, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Dept Informat Studies, Albany, NY 12222 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2013年 / 64卷 / 12期
关键词
SCIENCE POLICY; MAPS; DISCOVERY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1002/asi.22917
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
STEM, a set of fields that includes science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; allied disciplines ranging from environmental, agricultural, and earth sciences to life science and computer science; and education and training in these fields, is clearly at the top of the list of priority funding areas for governments, including the United States government. The U.S. has 11 federal agencies dedicated to supporting programs and providing funding for research and curriculum development. The domain of STEM education has significant implications in preparing the desired workforce with the requisite knowledge, developing appropriate curricula, providing teachers the necessary professional development, focusing research dollars on areas that have maximum impact, and developing national educational policy and standards. A complex undertaking such as STEM education, which attracts interest and valuable resources from a number of stakeholders needs to be well understood. In light of this, we attempt to describe the underlying structure of STEM education, its core areas, and their relationships through co-word analyses of the titles, keywords, and abstracts of the relevant literature using visualization and bibliometric mapping tools. Implications are drawn with respect to the nature of STEM education as well as curriculum and policy development.
引用
收藏
页码:2513 / 2536
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?
    Agarwal, Pankaj
    Searls, David B.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (11) : 865 - 878
  • [2] Differences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time
    Althouse, Benjamin M.
    West, Jevin D.
    Bergstrom, Carl T.
    Bergstrom, Theodore
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (01): : 27 - 34
  • [3] *AM ASS ADV SCI, 1989, PROJ 2061 SCI ALLL A
  • [4] An Y, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2346, P97
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, FED SCI TECHN ENG MA
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_11
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1983, NAT RISK IMP ED REF
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2009, PRES OB LAUNCH ED IN
  • [9] Borgman CL, 2002, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V36, P3
  • [10] Do We Need the h Index and Its Variants in Addition to Standard Bibliometric Measures?
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Mutz, Ruediger
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (06): : 1286 - 1289