Evidence-based discussion increases childhood vaccination uptake: a randomised cluster controlled trial of knowledge translation in Pakistan

被引:63
作者
Andersson, Neil [1 ]
Cockcroft, Anne [2 ]
Ansari, Noor M. [3 ]
Omer, Khalid [3 ]
Baloch, Manzoor [3 ]
Foster, Ari Ho [2 ]
Shea, Bev [2 ]
Wells, George A. [4 ]
Legorreta Soberanis, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Guerrero, CIET, El Roble 39640, Acapulco, Mexico
[2] Univ Ottawa, CIETcanada, Ottawa, ON K1N 6Z5, Canada
[3] CIET Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Ottawa Heart Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS | 2009年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Childhood vaccination rates are low in Lasbela, one of the poorest districts in Pakistan's Balochistan province. This randomised cluster controlled trial tested the effect on uptake of informed discussion of vaccination costs and benefits, without relying on improved health services. Methods: Following a baseline survey of randomly selected representative census enumeration areas, a computer generated random number sequence assigned 18 intervention and 14 control clusters. The intervention comprised three structured discussions separately with male and female groups in each cluster. The first discussion shared findings about vaccine uptake from the baseline study; the second focussed on the costs and benefits of childhood vaccination; the third focussed on local action plans. Field teams encouraged the group participants to spread the dialogue to households in their communities. Both intervention and control clusters received a district-wide health promotion programme emphasizing household hygiene. Interviewers in the household surveys were blind of intervention status of different clusters. A follow-up survey after one year measured impact of the intervention on uptake of measles and full DPT vaccinations of children aged 12-23 months, as reported by the mother or caregiver. Results: In the follow-up survey, measles and DPT vaccination uptake among children aged 12-23 months (536 in intervention clusters, 422 in control clusters) was significantly higher in intervention than in control clusters, where uptake fell over the intervention period. Adjusting for baseline differences between intervention and control clusters with generalized estimating equations, the intervention doubled the odds of measles vaccination in the intervention communities (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.24-3.88). It trebled the odds of full DPT vaccination (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.03-5.56). Conclusion: The relatively low cost knowledge translation intervention significantly increased vaccine uptake, without relying on improved services, in a poor district with limited access to services. This could have wide relevance in increasing coverage in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   NGO-promoted women's credit program, immunization coverage, and child mortality in rural Bangladesh [J].
Amin, R ;
Li, YP .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 1997, 25 (01) :71-87
[2]   Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731] [J].
Andersson, N ;
Cockcroft, A ;
Ansari, N ;
Omer, K ;
Losos, J ;
Ledogar, RJ ;
Tugwell, P ;
Shea, B .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 5 (1)
[3]   WHO PAYS FOR MEASLES - THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS FOR SUSTAINED IMMUNIZATION [J].
ANDERSSON, N ;
PAREDES, S ;
LEGORRETA, J ;
LEDOGAR, RJ .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1992, 7 (04) :352-363
[4]  
Andersson Neil, 2007, BMC Womens Health, V7, P11
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
[6]  
BATT K, 2004, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V82, P639
[7]  
Bolton P, 1998, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V113, P521
[8]   Separate spheres and indirect benefits [J].
Dan W Brock .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 1 (1)
[9]  
Brugha RF, 1996, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V74, P517
[10]   DOOR-TO-DOOR CANVASSING FOR IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM ACCELERATION IN MOZAMBIQUE - ACHIEVEMENTS AND COSTS [J].
CUTTS, FT ;
PHILLIPS, M ;
KORTBEEK, S ;
SOARES, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1990, 20 (04) :717-725