Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation

被引:31
作者
Ganglmair, Bernhard [1 ]
Froeb, Luke M. [2 ]
Werden, Gregory J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Jindal Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] US Dept Justice, Antitrust Div, Washington, DC 20530 USA
关键词
STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS; OPTION CONTRACTS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; RENEGOTIATION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6451.2012.00480.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Licensing technology essential to a standard can present a hold-up problem. After designing new products incorporating a standard, a manufacturer could be confronted by an innovator asserting patent rights to essential technology. This hold-up problem can be solved with a damages remedy provided by antitrust or some other body of law, but a damages remedy can reduce the innovator's licensing revenue and thereby retard innovation. The availability of an ex post damages remedy also alters the licensing terms in ex ante bargaining with the result that fewer socially beneficial R&D projects are undertaken.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 273
页数:25
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2011, HDB ANT ASP STAND SE
[2]   RENEGOTIATION DESIGN WITH UNVERIFIABLE INFORMATION [J].
AGHION, P ;
DEWATRIPONT, M ;
REY, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (02) :257-282
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Contract theory
[4]   The rules of standard-setting organizations: an empirical analysis [J].
Chiao, Benjamin ;
Lerner, Josh ;
Tirole, Jean .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (04) :905-930
[5]  
CHISUM DS, 2010, CHISUM PATENTS TREAT
[6]  
Cotter Thomas F., 2009, J. Corp. L., V34, P1151
[7]   DO PATENT HOLDUP AND ROYALTY STACKING LEAD TO SYSTEMATICALLY EXCESSIVE ROYALTIES? [J].
Elhauge, Einer .
JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2008, 4 (03) :535-570
[8]   How Strong Are Weak Patents? [J].
Farrell, Joseph ;
Shapiro, Carl .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (04) :1347-1369
[9]  
Farrell J, 2007, ANTITRUST LAW J, V74, P603
[10]  
Geradin D, 2009, ANTITRUST LAW J, V76, P329