Estimating the effect of sulfonylurea on HbA1c in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:118
作者
Hirst, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Farmer, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Dyar, A. [3 ]
Lung, T. W. C. [4 ]
Stevens, R. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
[2] Natl Inst Hlth Res, Sch Primary Care Res, Oxford, England
[3] Torbay Hosp, Torquay, England
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Hlth Programs Policy & Econ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Clinical science; Human; Meta-analysis; Oral pharmacological agents; Systematic review; INSULIN-TREATMENT; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMBINATION THERAPY; SECONDARY FAILURE; METABOLIC-CONTROL; NIDDM PATIENTS; DOSE-RESPONSE; TYPE-2; GLYBURIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-013-2856-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis Sulfonylureas are widely prescribed glucose-lowering medications for diabetes, but the extent to which they improve glycaemia is poorly documented. This systematic review evaluates how sulfonylurea treatment affects glycaemic control. Methods Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and clinical trials registries were searched to identify double-blinded randomised controlled trials of fixed-dose sulfonylurea monotherapy or sulfonylurea added on to other glucose-lowering treatments. The primary outcome assessed was change in HbA(1c), and secondary outcomes were adverse events, insulin dose and change in body weight. Results Thirty-one trials with a median duration of 16 weeks were included in the meta-analysis. Sulfonylurea monotherapy (nine trials) lowered HbA(1c) by 1.51% (17 mmol/mol) more than placebo (95% CI, 1.25, 1.78). Sulfonylureas added to oral diabetes treatment (four trials) lowered HbA(1c) by 1.62% (18 mmol/mol; 95% CI 1.0, 2.24) compared with the other treatment, and sulfonylurea added to insulin (17 trials) lowered HbA(1c) by 0.46% (6 mmol/mol; 95% CI 0.24, 0.69) and lowered insulin dose. Higher sulfonylurea doses did not reduce HbA(1c) more than lower doses. Sulfonylurea treatment resulted in more hypoglycaemic events (RR 2.41, 95% CI 1.41, 4.10) but did not significantly affect the number of other adverse events. Trial length, sulfonylurea type and duration of diabetes contributed to heterogeneity. Conclusions/interpretation Sulfonylurea monotherapy lowered HbA(1c) level more than previously reported, and we found no evidence that increasing sulfonylurea doses resulted in lower HbA(1c). HbA(1c) is a surrogate endpoint, and we were unable to examine long-term endpoints in these predominately short-term trials, but sulfonylureas appear to be associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemic events.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 984
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study [J].
Adler, AI ;
Stratton, IM ;
Neil, HAW ;
Yudkin, JS ;
Matthews, DR ;
Cull, CA ;
Wright, AD ;
Turner, RC ;
Holman, RR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7258) :412-419
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, BRIT NATL FORMULARY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COCHRANE LIB
[5]   Mechanisms of the glycaemic effects of sulfonylureas [J].
Ashcroft, FM .
HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 1996, 28 (09) :456-463
[6]   PROLONGATION OF NEAR-NORMOGLYCEMIC REMISSION IN BLACK NIDDM SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-DOSE SULFONYLUREA TREATMENT [J].
BANERJI, MA ;
CHAIKEN, RL ;
LEBOVITZ, HE .
DIABETES, 1995, 44 (04) :466-470
[7]   SOME EXAMPLES OF REGRESSION TOWARDS THE MEAN .7. [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6957) :780-780
[8]   TAK-875 versus placebo or glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Burant, Charles F. ;
Viswanathan, Prabhakar ;
Marcinak, John ;
Cao, Charlie ;
Vakilynejad, Majid ;
Xie, Benhuai ;
Leifke, Eckhard .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9824) :1403-1411
[9]  
CAMERINIDAVALOS RA, 1994, CLIN THER, V16, P952
[10]   Comparing the actions of older and newer therapies on body weight: to what extent should these effects guide the selection of antidiabetic therapy? [J].
Campbell, I. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (06) :791-801