The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention

被引:46
作者
Dale, Rick [1 ]
Kirkham, Natasha Z. [2 ]
Richardson, Daniel C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Merced, CA 95343 USA
[2] Birkbeck Univ London, Ctr Brain & Cognit Dev, London, England
[3] UCL, London, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2011年 / 2卷
关键词
language; reference; vision; attention; coordination; synchrony; interaction; communication;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00355
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the tangram task, two participants are presented with the same set of abstract shapes portrayed in different orders. One participant must instruct the other to arrange their shapes so that the orders match. To do this, they must find a way to refer to the abstract shapes. In the current experiment, the eye movements of pairs of participants were tracked while they were engaged in a computerized version of the task. Results revealed the canonical tangram effect: participants became faster at completing the task from round 1 to round 3. Also, their eye-movements synchronized over time. Cross-recurrence analysis was used to quantify this coordination, and showed that as participants' words coalesced, their actions approximated a single coordinated system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[2]   Testing sequential association: Estimating exact p values using sampled permutations [J].
Bakeman, R ;
Robinson, BF ;
Quera, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (01) :4-15
[3]   MEMORY REPRESENTATIONS IN NATURAL TASKS [J].
BALLARD, DH ;
HAYHOE, MM ;
PELZ, JB .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 7 (01) :66-80
[4]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[5]   Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series [J].
Boker, SM ;
Xu, MQ ;
Rotondo, JL ;
King, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (03) :338-355
[6]  
Brennan S.E., 2005, APPROACHES STUDYING, P95
[7]   Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation [J].
Brennan, SE ;
Clark, HH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (06) :1482-1493
[8]  
Brown-Schmidt S., 2005, APPROACHES STUDYING, P153
[9]   Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation [J].
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah ;
Gunlogson, Christine ;
Tanenhaus, Michael K. .
COGNITION, 2008, 107 (03) :1122-1134
[10]  
Clark H., USING LANGUAGE