Contractual and technological approaches for protecting digital works:: their relationship with copyright limitations

被引:4
作者
Fernández-Molina, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Granada, Spain
关键词
copyright law; intellectual property; contract law; licensing;
D O I
10.1108/14684520410531646
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To deal with the new circumstances arising in the digital environment, with its particular conditions for the access, distribution and use of intellectual works, three distinct approaches exist: legal (copyright laws are modified to adapt them to the new context), technological (systems designed to control access and use of works), and contractual (through licenses to regulate the conditions of use of the works). The joint use of technological measures and licenses, together with the laws that protect both, are seriously endangering the effectiveness of the limitations to copyright set forth by law to benefit libraries, their users and citizens in general. This represents a strong privatisation of access to information. Using as a point of reference the laws of countries that are on the front lines of this terrain - the USA, the European Union and Australia - some problems created by the new forms of protection of intellectual works are examined.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 157
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The battle over the institutional ecosystem in the digital environment [J].
Benkler, Y .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2001, 44 (02) :84-90
[2]  
Boyle J., 1996, Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society
[3]   Lochner in cyberspace:: The new economic orthodoxy of "rights management" [J].
Cohen, JE .
MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 1998, 97 (02) :462-563
[4]  
*COPYR LAW REV COM, 2002, COP CONTR
[5]  
Crews KD, 2001, J COPYRIGHT SOC USA, V49, P549
[6]   Freedom to copy [J].
Denicola, RC .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 108 (07) :1661-1686
[7]  
DEWERRA J, 2001, ALAI 2001 C ADJ ALT
[8]   A new copyright order: Why national courts should create global norms [J].
Dinwoodie, GB .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2000, 149 (02) :469-580
[9]  
DREYFUSS RC, 2000, BROOKLYN J INT LAW, V26, P49
[10]  
*EBLIDA, 2000, EBLIDA RESP PROP DIR