Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing

被引:37
作者
Atkinson, Henry D. [1 ,2 ]
Johal, Karanjeev S. [1 ]
Willis-Owen, Charles [2 ]
Zadow, Steven [2 ,3 ]
Oakeshott, Roger D. [2 ]
机构
[1] N Middlesex Univ Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed & N London Sports Orthopa, London N18 1QX, England
[2] Sportsmed SA, Adelaide, SA 5069, Australia
[3] St Andrews Hosp, Dept Radiol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Acetabular Version; Pelvic Parameter; Acetabular Inclination; Femoral Torsion; Femoral Neck Anteversion;
D O I
10.1186/1749-799X-5-76
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
There is limited morphological data on the sex differences between the commonly used pelvic parameters. This study analysed the CT scans of 100 consecutive Caucasian patients, 61 males and 39 females, undergoing hip resurfacing arthroplasty surgery for hip osteoarthritis in one institution. There were no sex differences in femoral torsion/anteversion, femoral neck angle and acetabular inclination. Males had a mean femoral torsion/anteversion of 8 degrees (range -5 to 26 degrees), a mean femoral neck angle of 129 degrees (range 119 to 138 degrees) and a mean acetabular inclination of 55 degrees (range 40 to 86 degrees). Females had a mean femoral torsion/anteversion of 9 degrees (range -2 to 31 degrees), a mean femoral neck angle of 128 degrees (range 121 to 138) and a mean acetabular inclination of 57 degrees (range 44 to 80 degrees). Females had a significantly greater acetabular version of 23 degrees (range 10 to 53) compared with 18 degrees in males (range 7 to 46 degrees (p = 0.02) and males had a significantly greater femoral offset of 55 mm (range 42 to 68 mm) compared with 48 mm (range 37 to 57 mm) in females (p = 0.00). There were no significant differences between measurements taken from each patient's right and left hips. These findings may be useful for the future design and the implantation of hip arthroplasty components.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Component Alignment in Hip Resurfacing Using Computer Navigation [J].
Bailey, Chris ;
Gul, Rehan ;
Falworth, Mark ;
Zadow, Steven ;
Oakeshott, Roger .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (04) :917-922
[2]
Hermann KL, 1998, ACTA RADIOL, V39, P410
[3]
Hermann KL, 1997, ACTA RADIOL, V38, P527
[4]
Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: High validity of the "cross-over-sign" [J].
Jamali, Amir A. ;
Mladenov, Kiril ;
Meyer, Dominik C. ;
Martinez, Alberto ;
Beck, Martin ;
Ganz, Reinhold ;
Leunig, Michael .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2007, 25 (06) :758-765
[5]
Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65 [J].
Kaptoge, S ;
Dalzell, N ;
Loveridge, N ;
Beck, TJ ;
Khaw, KT ;
Reeve, J .
BONE, 2003, 32 (05) :561-570
[6]
Racial and gender variations in adult hip morphology [J].
Lavy, CBD ;
Msamati, BC ;
Igbigbi, PS .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2003, 27 (06) :331-333
[7]
Femoral offset: Anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty [J].
Lecerf, G. ;
Fessy, M. H. ;
Philippot, R. ;
Massin, P. ;
Giraud, F. ;
Flecher, X. ;
Girard, J. ;
Mertl, P. ;
Marchetti, E. ;
Stindel, E. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2009, 95 (03) :210-219
[8]
Hip Flexion After Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Role of Cup Anteversion, Anterior Femoral Head-Neck Offset, and Head-Neck Ratio [J].
Malviya, Ajay ;
Lingard, Elizabeth A. ;
Malik, Atul ;
Bowman, Russell ;
Holland, James P. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (03) :387-391
[9]
Racial differences in femoral dimensions and their relation to hip fracture [J].
Mikhail, MB ;
Vaswani, AN ;
Aloia, JF .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (01) :22-24
[10]
THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF ACETABULAR ORIENTATION [J].
MURRAY, DW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (02) :228-232