Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars

被引:187
作者
Elwyn, G [1 ]
Edwards, A
Gwyn, R
Grol, R
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Coll Med, Dept Postgrad Educ Gen Practice, Cardiff CF4 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales, Coll Med, Dept Gen Practice, Cardiff CF4 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Wales, Coll Med, Dept Gen Practice, Llanedeyrn Hlth Ctr, Cardiff CF3 7PN, S Glam, Wales
[4] Cardiff Univ, Hlth Commun Res Ctr, Sch Engn Commun & Philosophy, Cardiff CF1 3XB, S Glam, Wales
[5] Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Qual Care Res, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To explore the views of general practice registrars about involving patients in decisions and to assess the feasibility of using the shared decision making model by means of simulated general practice consultations. Design Qualitative study based on focus group interviews. Setting General practice vocational training schemes in south Wales. Participants 39 general practice registrars and eight course organisers (acting as observers) attended four sessions; three simulated patients attended each time. Method After an introduction to the principles and suggested stages of shared decision making the registrars conducted and observed a series of consultations about choices of treatment with simulated patients using verbal, numerical, and graphical data formats. Reactions were elicited by using focus group interviews after each consultation and content analysis undertaken. Results Registrars in general practice report not being trained in the skills required to involve patients in clinical decisions. They had a wide range of opinions about "involving patients in decisions," ranging from protective paternalism ("doctor knows best"), through enlightened self interest (lightening the load), to the potential rewards of a more egalitarian relationship with patients. The work points to three contextual precursors for the process: the availability of reliable information, appropriate timing of the decision making process, and the readiness of patients to accept an active role in their own management Conclusions Sharing decisions entails sharing the uncertainties about the outcomes of medical processes and involves exposing the fact that data are often unavailable or not known; this can cause anxiety to both patient and clinician. Movement towards further patient involvement will depend on both the skills and the attitudes of professionals, and this work shows the steps that need to be taken if further progress is to be made in this direction.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 756
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[2]  
DOWIE J, 1998, GUIDELINES HLTH CARE
[3]   Communication about risk: diversity among primary care professionals [J].
Edwards, A ;
Matthews, E ;
Pill, R ;
Bloor, M .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (04) :296-300
[4]   General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study [J].
Edwards, A ;
Elwyn, G ;
Gwyn, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :749-752
[5]  
Elwyn G, 1999, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V49, P477
[6]  
ELWYN G, 1999, SHARED DECISION MAKI
[7]  
Elwyn Glyn, 1999, Health Expect, V2, P105, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00045.x
[8]  
FISHER S, 1986, DISCOURSE I ACTIVITY
[9]  
Frankland J, 1997, USE FOCUS GROUPS HLT, P144
[10]   The physician-patient encounter: The physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model [J].
Gafni, A ;
Charles, C ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 47 (03) :347-354