Aquatic Risks of Pesticides, Ecological Protection Goals, and Common Aims in European Union Legislation

被引:119
作者
Brock, Theo C. M. [1 ]
Arts, Gertie H. P. [1 ]
Maltby, Lorraine [2 ]
Van den Brink, Paul J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Alterra, Ctr Water & Climate, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Wageningen Univ, Dept Aquat Ecol & Water Qual Management, NL-6700 DD Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Plant protection products; Freshwater ecosystems; Ecological effect assessment; Water Framework; Directive; 91/414/EEC;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.5630020402
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This discussion paper presents a framework for spatiotemporal differentiation in ecological protection goals to assess the risks of pesticides in surface waters. It also provides a proposal to harmonize the different scientific approaches for ecotoxicological effect assessment adopted in guidance documents that support different legislative directives in the European Union (Water Framework Directive and Uniform Principles). Decision schemes to derive maximum permissible concentrations in surface water are presented. These schemes are based on approaches recommended in regulatory guidance documents and are scientifically underpinned by critical review papers concerning the impact of pesticides on freshwater organisms and communities. Special attention is given to the approaches based on standard test species, species sensitivity distribution curves, and model ecosystem experiments. The decision schemes presented here may play a role in the "acceptability'' debate and can be used as options in the process of communication between risk assessors and risk managers as well as between these risk experts and other stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:E20 / E46
页数:27
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions [J].
Aldenberg, T ;
Jaworska, JS .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2000, 46 (01) :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GUIDANCE DOCUMENT HI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Off J Eur Union L, V330, P32
[4]   Ecological Impact in Ditch Mesocosms of Simulated Spray Drift from a Crop Protection Program for Potatoes [J].
Arts, Gertie H. P. ;
Buijse-Bogdan, Laura L. ;
Belgers, J. Dick M. ;
van Rhenen-Kersten, Caroline H. ;
van Wijngaarden, Rene P. A. ;
Roessink, Ivo ;
Maund, Steve J. ;
van den Brink, Paul J. ;
Brock, Theo C. M. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (02) :105-125
[5]   THE DAPHNIA BIOASSAY - A CRITIQUE [J].
BAIRD, DJ ;
BARBER, I ;
BRADLEY, M ;
CALOW, P ;
SOARES, AMVM .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1989, 188 :403-406
[6]   Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment [J].
Barnthouse, LW .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 23 (02) :500-508
[7]   Integration of aquatic fate and ecological responses to linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS) in model stream ecosystems [J].
Belanger, SE ;
Bowling, JW ;
Lee, DM ;
LeBlanc, EM ;
Kerr, KM ;
McAvoy, DC ;
Christman, SC ;
Davidson, DH .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2002, 52 (02) :150-171
[8]   DIRECT AND INDIRECT ECOTOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ALKYL SULFATE AND ALKYL ETHOXYSULFATE ON MACROINVERTEBRATES IN STREAM MESOCOSMS [J].
BELANGER, SE ;
MEIERS, EM ;
BAUSCH, RG .
AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 33 (01) :65-87
[9]   On the state of the art: risk communication to the public [J].
Bier, VM .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (02) :139-150
[10]  
BIEVER RC, 1994, PROC BRIGHTON CROP, P1367