Patterns of spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of birds, floristics, physiognomy, and primary productivity in the central Great Basin, USA

被引:30
作者
Fleishman, E [1 ]
Mac Nally, R
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Australian Ctr Biodivers Anal Policy & Management, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Bayesian analysis; biodiversity patterns; dissimilarity measures; Great Basin; semivariograms; spatial scale;
D O I
10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00240.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We fitted spatial autocorrelation functions to distance-based data for assemblages of birds and for three attributes of birds' habitats at 140 locations, separated by up to 65 km, in the Great Basin (Nevada, USA). The three habitat characteristics were taxonomic composition of the vegetation, physical structure of the vegetation, and a measure of primary productivity, the normalized difference vegetation index, estimated from satellite imagery. We found that a spherical model was the best fit to data for avifaunal composition, vegetation composition, and primary productivity, but the distance at which spatial correlation effectively was zero differed substantially among data sets (c. 30 km for birds, 20 km for vegetation composition, and 60 km for primary productivity). A power-law function was the best fit to data for vegetation structure, indicating that the structure of vegetation differed by similar amounts irrespective of distance between locations (up to the maximum distance measured). Our results suggested that the spatial structure of bird assemblages is more similar to vegetation composition than to either vegetation structure or primary productivity, but is autocorrelated over larger distances. We believe that the greater mobility of birds compared with plants may be responsible for this difference.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 243
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, Selected papers of hirotugu akaike, P267
[2]   HABITAT SELECTION OF BREEDING BIRDS IN AN EAST TENNESSEE DECIDUOUS FOREST [J].
ANDERSON, SH ;
SHUGART, HH .
ECOLOGY, 1974, 55 (04) :828-837
[3]  
Banerjee S., 2004, HIERARCHICAL MODELIN
[4]  
BETRUS CJ, 2002, THESIS MIAMI U OXFOR
[5]  
Burnham K. P., 1998, MODEL SELECTION INFE
[6]  
CARR JR, 1995, NUMERICAL ANAL GEOLO
[7]  
Congdon P., 2003, APPL BAYESIAN MODELL
[8]  
Cressie N, 1993, STAT SPATIAL DATA
[9]  
Dale, 1999, SPATIAL PATTERN ANAL, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511612589, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511612589]
[10]   Conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis [J].
Dale, MRT ;
Dixon, P ;
Fortin, MJ ;
Legendre, P ;
Myers, DE ;
Rosenberg, MS .
ECOGRAPHY, 2002, 25 (05) :558-577