Randomized placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram and venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

被引:39
作者
Bose, Anjana [1 ]
Korotzer, Andrew [1 ]
Gommoll, Carl [1 ]
Li, Dayong [1 ]
机构
[1] Harborside Financial Ctr, Forest Labs, Jersey City, NJ 07311 USA
关键词
SSRI; SNRI; GAD; efficacy; safety; tolerability;
D O I
10.1002/da.20355
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release (XR) both are indicated for the treatment of GAD. Outpatients (ages 18-65 years) with DSM-IV-defined GAD (Hamilton Anxiety Scale [HAMA] >= 20) were eligible to participate in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, flexible-dose trial. Following randomization, patients received 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day; N = 127), venlafaxine XR (75-225 mg/day; N = 129), or placebo (N = 136). The primary efficacy parameter was mean change from baseline at week 8 in HAMA total score, using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCI) approach. Secondary efficacy parameters were HAMA psychic anxiety subscale, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Treatment was completed by 77% of patients. The least square mean difference for change from baseline at week 8 in HAMA total score for escitalopram and venlafaxine XR versus placebo were -1.52 (P = .09) and -2.27 (P = .01), respectively, for LOCF, and -1.92 (P = .033) and -3.02 (P = .001), respectively, for Observed Cases (OC). On all secondary parameters, both active treatments were significantly superior to placebo on the LOCF and OC analyses. Discontinuation due to adverse events was not different for escitalopram versus placebo (7 versus 5%, P = .61), but was significantly greater for venlafaxine XR (13916) versus placebo (P =. 03). Venlafaxine XR, but not escitalopram, separated from placebo on the primary efficacy measure, using the LOCF approach. However, overall efficacy analyses suggest that escitalopram and venlafaxine XR are both effective treatments for GAD. Escitalopram was better tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 861
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Venlafaxine extended release (ER) in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder - Twenty-four-week placebo-controlled dose-ranging study [J].
Allgulander, C ;
Hackett, D ;
Salinas, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 179 :15-22
[2]  
ALLGULANDER C, 2005, INT J NEUROPSYCHOPH, V9, P1
[3]   Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability [J].
Anderson, IM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 58 (01) :19-36
[4]  
APA A.P. A., 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV, V4th
[5]   Escitalopram and paroxetine in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder - Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study [J].
Baldwin, David S. ;
Huusom, Anna Karina Trap ;
Maehlum, Eli .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 189 :264-272
[6]  
Baldwin David S, 2005, Expert Rev Neurother, V5, P443, DOI 10.1586/14737175.5.4.443
[7]   Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Baldwin, DS ;
Polkinghorn, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) :293-302
[8]   A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder [J].
Bielski, RJ ;
Ventura, D ;
Chang, CC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (09) :1190-1196
[9]   Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release and buspirone in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Davidson, JRT ;
DuPont, RL ;
Hedges, D ;
Haskins, JT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (08) :528-535
[10]   Severe adverse drug reactions of antidepressants:: Results of the German multicenter drug surveillance program AMSP [J].
Degner, D ;
Grohmann, R ;
Kropp, S ;
Rüther, E ;
Bender, S ;
Engel, RR ;
Schmidt, LG .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2004, 37 :S39-S45