A practical approach to Bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables

被引:135
作者
Euser, Anne M. [2 ]
Dekker, Friedo W. [2 ]
le Cessie, Saskia [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
reproducibility of results; skinfold thickness; evaluation methodology; reliability; agreement; Bland-Altman plots; coefficients of variation; study design;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Indicators of reproducibility for log-transformed variables can often not be calculated straightforwardly and are subsequently incorrectly interpreted. Methods and Results: We discuss meaningful Coefficients of Variation (CV) for log-transformed variables, which can be derived directly from the standard error of the log-transformed measurements. To provide easy interpretable Bland and Altman plots, we calculated limits of inter and intraobserver agreement (LA) for log-transformed variables and transform them back to the original scale. These LAs for agreement are subsequently plotted on the original scale in a conventional Bland and Altman plot. Both approaches were illustrated in a clinical example on the reproducibility of skinfold thickness measurements. Conclusion: In reproducibility, it is important to calculate meaningful CVs, LAs, and Bland-Altman plots for log-transformed variables. We provide a practical approach in which existing statistical methods are applied in the field of reproducibility, thus leading to parameters of reproducibility which can be interpreted on the original scale. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 982
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[2]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]
Statistics notes: Measurement error proportional to the mean .23. [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7049) :106-106
[4]
When to use agreement versus reliability measures [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1033-1039
[5]
Dewitte K, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P799
[6]
Euser AM, 2005, AM J CLIN NUTR, V81, P480
[7]
Reliability studies can be designed more efficiently by using variance components estimates from different sources [J].
Euser, Anne M. ;
le Cessiec, Saskia ;
Finken, Martijn J. J. ;
Wit, Jan M. ;
Dekker, Friedo W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (10) :1010-1014
[8]
Interviewer variability in anthropometric measurements and estimates of body composition [J].
KlipsteinGrobusch, K ;
Georg, T ;
Boeing, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 :S174-S180
[9]
Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements [J].
Rousson, V ;
Gasser, T ;
Seifert, B .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (22) :3431-3446
[10]
Streiner D., 2003, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, P126