Effect of the nuclear-donor cell lineage, type, and cell donor on development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in cattle

被引:33
作者
Batchelder, CA [1 ]
Hoffert, KA [1 ]
Bertolini, M [1 ]
Moyer, AL [1 ]
Mason, JB [1 ]
Petkov, SG [1 ]
Famula, TR [1 ]
Anderson, GB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/clo.2005.7.238
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Potential applications of somatic cell nuclear transfer to agriculture and medicine are currently constrained by low efficiency and high rates of embryonic, fetal, and neonatal loss. Nuclear transfer efficiency in cattle was compared between three donor-cell treatments from a single animal, between four donor-cell treatments in sequential stages of differentiation from a single cell lineage and genotype, and between the same cell type in two donors. Cumulus and granulosa donor cells resulted in a greater proportion of viable day-7 embryos than ear-skin cells; pregnancy rate and losses were not different among treatments. The least differentiated cell type in the follicular cell lineage, preantral follicle cells, resulted in fewer cloned blastocysts (11%) than cumulus (30%), granulosa (23%), and luteal (25%) donor cells. Cloned blastocysts that did develop from preantral follicle cells (75%) were more likely to progress through implantation into later stages of pregnancy than cloned blastocysts from cumulus (10%), granulosa (9%), and luteal (11%) donor cells (p < 0.05). Day-7 embryo development from granulosa cells was similar between two donors (19 vs. 24%) and proved to be a poor indicator of further development as day-30 pregnancy rates varied threefold between donors (48 vs. 15%, p < 0.05). Results reported here emphasize the crucial role of the nuclear-donor cell in the outcome of the nuclear-transfer process.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 254
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer embryos and postnatal survival rate of cloned calves produced by two different timings of fusion and activation [J].
Akagi, S ;
Adachi, N ;
Matsukawa, K ;
Kubo, M ;
Takahashi, S .
MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 66 (03) :264-272
[2]   In vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos from transgenic clonal lines of adult and fetal fibroblast cells of the same genotype [J].
Arat, S ;
Gibbons, J ;
Rzucidlo, SJ ;
Respess, DS ;
Tumlin, M ;
Stice, SL .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2002, 66 (06) :1768-1774
[3]   INFLUENCE OF RECIPIENT OOCYTE CELL-CYCLE STAGE ON DNA-SYNTHESIS, NUCLEAR-ENVELOPE BREAKDOWN, CHROMOSOME CONSTITUTION, AND DEVELOPMENT IN NUCLEAR TRANSPLANT BOVINE EMBRYOS [J].
BARNES, FL ;
COLLAS, P ;
POWELL, R ;
KING, WA ;
WESTHUSIN, M ;
SHEPHERD, D .
MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 36 (01) :33-41
[4]   DEVELOPMENT OF PRE-IMPLANTATION EMBRYOS OF THE GOLDEN-HAMSTER IN A DEFINED CULTURE-MEDIUM [J].
BAVISTER, BD ;
LEIBFRIED, ML ;
LIEBERMAN, G .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1983, 28 (01) :235-247
[5]   The control of follicular wave development for self-appointed embryo transfer programs in cattle [J].
Bó, GA ;
Baruselli, PS ;
Moreno, D ;
Cutaia, L ;
Caccia, M ;
Tríbulo, R ;
Tríbulo, H ;
Mapletoft, RJ .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2002, 57 (01) :53-72
[6]   Bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer using recipient oocytes recovered by ovum pick-up:: Effect of maternal lineage of oocyte donors [J].
Brüggerhoff, K ;
Zakhartchenko, V ;
Wenigerkind, H ;
Reichenbach, HD ;
Prelle, K ;
Schernthaner, W ;
Alberio, R ;
Küchenhoff, H ;
Stojkovic, M ;
Brem, G ;
Hiendleder, S ;
Wolf, E .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2002, 66 (02) :367-373
[7]  
Campbell K H, 1996, Rev Reprod, V1, P40, DOI 10.1530/ror.0.0010040
[8]   NUCLEAR-CYTOPLASMIC INTERACTIONS DURING THE 1ST CELL-CYCLE OF NUCLEAR TRANSFER RECONSTRUCTED BOVINE EMBRYOS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID REPLICATION AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
CAMPBELL, KHS ;
RITCHIE, WA ;
WILMUT, I .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1993, 49 (05) :933-942
[9]   Clinical, hormonal, and hematologic characteristics of bovine calves derived from nuclei from somatic cells [J].
Chavatte-Palmer, P ;
Heyman, Y ;
Richard, C ;
Monget, P ;
LeBourhis, D ;
Kann, G ;
Chilliard, Y ;
Vignon, X ;
Renard, JP .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2002, 66 (06) :1596-1603
[10]   Development of bovine oocytes reconstructed with different donor somatic cells with or without serum starvation [J].
Cho, JK ;
Lee, BC ;
Park, JI ;
Lim, JM ;
Shin, SJ ;
Kim, KY ;
Lee, BD ;
Hwang, WS .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2002, 57 (07) :1819-1828