Methane production and microbial community structure in single-stage batch and sequential batch systems anaerobically co-digesting food waste and biosolids

被引:83
作者
Dearman, B
Marschner, P
Bentham, RH
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Biol Sci, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Environm Hlth, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00253-005-0076-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 [微生物学]; 0836 [生物工程]; 090102 [作物遗传育种]; 100705 [微生物与生化药学];
摘要
Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and biosolids was carried out in sequential batch and single-stage batch systems in four treatments. Methane yield, which was used as a functional process parameter, differed between treatments, with the single-stage batch system generating lower volumes than the sequential batch systems. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations and pH in the leachate also differed between treatments. VFA concentrations were highest and methane generation yields lowest in the single-stage batch system in comparison to the sequential batch systems. The anaerobic microbial community structure of the domains Archaea and Bacteria, determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, differed between treatments and was correlated to a number of environmental parameters such as pH, VFA concentration and methane generation rate. Methane generation rate was significantly correlated to the community structure of Bacteria but not Archaea. This indicated that the substrates that are produced by acetogens (Bacteria) are important for the growth and community structure of the methanogens (Archaea). Community structure of Archaea changed over time, but this had no observable effect on functional ability based on methane yields. Microbial diversity (H') was shown to be not important in developing a functionally successful anaerobic microbial community.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 596
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Methanogenic population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste [J].
Angenent, LT ;
Sung, SW ;
Raskin, L .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (18) :4648-4654
[2]
ATLAS RM, 1987, MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
[3]
METHANE PRODUCTION FROM MUNICIPAL REFUSE - A REVIEW OF ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES AND MICROBIAL DYNAMICS [J].
BARLAZ, MA ;
HAM, RK ;
SCHAEFER, DM .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, 1990, 19 (06) :557-584
[4]
BARLAZ MA, 1997, MANUAL ENV MICROBIOL
[5]
Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Touhami, Y ;
Cheikh, RB ;
Hamdi, M .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 40 (3-4) :989-995
[6]
Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies [J].
Callaghan, FJ ;
Wase, DAJ ;
Thayanithy, K ;
Forster, CF .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 67 (02) :117-122
[7]
Molecular monitoring of microbial diversity in an UASB reactor [J].
Casserly, C ;
Erijman, L .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2003, 52 (01) :7-12
[8]
Chynoweth D, 1996, Microbiology of solid waste
[9]
EHRIG HJ, 1996, LANDFILLING WASTE
[10]
Fernández A, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P3697