Change in staff anesthesiologists' opinions of an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS)

被引：3

作者：

Pysyk, Christopher L. ^{[1
]}

Jee, Robert ^{[1
]}

Zunder, Ian ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Gen Campus,501 Smyth Rd,Crit Care Wing 1401, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada

[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Fac Med, Civ Campus,Room B307,1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING | 2019年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

Anesthesia record; Electronic; Patient safety; Information management system;

D O I：

10.1007/s10877-018-0178-4

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

Following introduction of an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) at a tertiary care, academic health sciences centre, a quality assurance initiative was conducted to assess staff opinions of the AIMS using a previously published, anonymous survey tool at 1 and 5years following AIMS introduction. At 5years compared to 1year after implementation of AIMS, the majority (18 of 24, 75%) of responses to the survey questions had a statistically significant change (P<0.05) in the proportion of respondents favoring AIMS compared to the 1year survey. Domains noted to be more favorable 5years compared to 1year after AIMS introduction included patient safety in the Operating Rooms and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, quality of handover and overall documentation, and communication amongst healthcare workers. The ideal time period at which to assess AIMS after introduction is not clear.

引用

页码：541 / 542

页数：2