Glaucoma patients' assessment of their visual function and quality of life

被引:122
作者
Jampel, HD
Schwartz, A
Pollack, I
Abrams, D
Weiss, H
Miller, R
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Glaucoma Serv, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Washington Eye Phys & Surg, Chevy Chase, MD USA
[3] Sinai Hosp, Glaucoma Serv, Krieger Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
关键词
glaucoma; utility tests; quality-of-life; Esterman visual field; linear rating;
D O I
10.1097/00061198-200204000-00012
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine how glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients' rating of their vision correlates with Esterman binocular visual field testing and other visual function tests. Methods: One hundred ninety-one glaucoma patients and 46 glaucoma suspect patients underwent binocular visual field testing and evaluated their vision using the linear rating scale and time-tradeoff utility tests, the National Eye Institute Visual Functional Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality-of-life instruments. Results: The mean Esterman score was 88.2 +/- 17.4 for the glaucoma subjects and 95.2 + 6.9 for glaucoma suspect subjects (maximum score 1 00). On a scale from 0 (blind) to 100 (ideal), the mean rating of vision for glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspect patients was 74.8 +/- 17.3 and 78.9 +/- 18.5, respectively. The Esterman test correlated moderately with the overall NEI VFQ-25 score (partial correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.32, P = 0.001), but only weakly with the linear rating scale (PCC 0.17, P = 0.02), and the time-tradeoff (PCC = 0.14, P = 0.06). Conclusion: Utility values that glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients assign to their vision do not correlate well with Esterman results. A challenge for the future is the design of clinical tests of vision that better correlate with patient perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BAILEY IL, 1976, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V53, P740
[2]   Preference values for visual states in patients planning to undergo cataract surgery [J].
Bass, EB ;
Wills, S ;
Scott, IU ;
Javitt, JC ;
Tielsch, JM ;
Schein, OD ;
Steinberg, EP .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (03) :324-330
[3]  
Brown G C, 1999, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V97, P473
[4]   Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma [J].
Crabb, DP ;
Viswanathan, AC ;
McNaught, AI ;
Poinoosawmy, D ;
Fitzke, FW ;
Hitchings, RA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 82 (11) :1236-1241
[5]  
ESTERMAN B, 1982, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V89, P1226
[6]  
FISHER LD, 1993, BIOSTATISTICS METHOD, P430
[7]   METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING HEALTH-STATE PREFERENCES .2. SCALING METHODS [J].
FROBERG, DG ;
KANE, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :459-471
[8]  
FURLONG W, 1990, MCMASTER U CHEPA WOR, V909, P1
[9]  
GAASTERLAND DE, 1994, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V101, P1445
[10]  
Gordon MO, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P573