Reflections on Religious Belief and Prosociality: Comment on Galen (2012)

被引:36
作者
Myers, David G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hope Coll, Dept Psychol, Holland, MI 49422 USA
关键词
religiosity; religion; altruism; prosocial; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0029009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Luke Galen (2012) offers a timely analysis of associations between religiosity and prosocial and antisocial attitudes and behaviors. After identifying 10 points of agreement, I raise 8 questions for further reflection and research: (1) Is ingroup giving and volunteerism not prosocial? (2) Are religion-related prosocial norms part of the religious factor? (3) Is social support also appropriately considered part of the religious factor? (4) Are self-report data from more and less religious people invalid? (5) How should we disentangle gender and religiosity? (6) How might we resolve "the religious engagement paradox"? (7) Does religion serve an adaptive, evolutionary function? And (8) Might research further explore religiosity, in its varieties, and prosociality?
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 917
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   PERSONAL RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION AND PREJUDICE [J].
ALLPORT, GW ;
ROSS, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 5 (04) :432-&
[2]  
Anderson Elizabeth, 2007, GOD IS DEAD IS EVERY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1958, NATURE PREJUDICE
[4]  
Center for Global Prosperity, 2007, IND GLOB PHIL
[5]   Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality A Systematic Quantitative Review [J].
Chida, Yoichi ;
Steptoe, Andrew ;
Powell, Lynda H. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2009, 78 (02) :81-90
[6]  
Cialdini R.B., 2012, Handbook of theories of social psychology, P295, DOI [10.4135/9781446249222.n41, DOI 10.4135/9781446249222.N41]
[7]  
Council for a Parliament of the World's Religions, 1993, 1993 PARL WORLDS REL
[8]  
Dawkins R., 2001, GUARDIAN 0529
[9]  
Deaton A. S., 2009, 15271 NBER
[10]   The Religion Paradox: If Religion Makes People Happy, Why Are So Many Dropping Out? [J].
Diener, Ed ;
Tay, Louis ;
Myers, David G. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) :1278-1290