Joint IDF-IUPAC-IAEA(FAO) interlaboratory validation for determining aflatoxin M1 in milk by using immunoaffinity clean-up before thin-layer chromatography

被引:17
作者
Grosso, F
Fremy, JM
Bevis, S
Dragacci, S
机构
[1] AFSSA, Microbial Toxins Unit, F-94700 Maisons Alfort, France
[2] Rbiopharm, Glasgow G20 0SP, Lanark, Scotland
来源
FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS | 2004年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
aflatoxin M-1; milk; immunoaffinity; thin-layer chromatography; collaborative study;
D O I
10.1080/02652030410001662048
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
A collaborative study was conducted under the auspices of the International Dairy Federation (IDF), the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a collaborative Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) body fully to validate a method combining immunoaffinity clean-up to thin-layer chromatography for the determination of aflatoxin M-1 in milk. Work was done in order to afford those laboratories not equipped with high-performance liquid chromatography, mainly from developing countries, with a simplified but fully validated method as an alternative to the European validated immunoaffinity-high performance liquid chromatography method published as an EN ISO Standard 14501, February 1999. The validation study was carried out on samples of aflatoxin M-1 -contaminated milk and milk powder at levels close to the tolerable level of 0.5 mug l(-1) as recommended by the Codex Alimentarius and to the regulatory level of 0.05 mug l(-1) as laid down by the European Commission. Fourteen laboratories representing 11 countries participated in the trial. The relative standard deviations for repeatability and reproducibility based on raw data were in the range 27-48 and 35-54%, respectively. The recovery rate varied from 32 to 120%. The mishandling of two crucial steps of the protocol such as matrix sample reconstitution and extract evaporation could explain the wide variation of the recovery rate. For this reason, data were then corrected for recovery. Consequently, the relative standard deviations for repeatability and reproducibility were recalculated after correction for recovery and were in the range 26-54 and 34-53%, respectively. The method will be published as a standard ISO/DIS 14674--IDF 190.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 357
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 431 ISOIEC
[2]  
*AOAC OFF METH, 2000, AFL M1 LIQ MILK IMM
[3]  
BETINA V, 1993, CHROMATOGRAPHY MYCOT, P141
[4]  
Burdaspal P, 2001, J AOAC INT, V84, P1445
[5]  
*CEN, 1999, FOOD AN BIOT CRIT AN
[6]  
*COD AL, 2002, 0141 ALINORM COD AL
[7]  
Dragacci S, 2001, J AOAC INT, V84, P437
[8]  
*EN ISO, 1998, 14501 EN ISO
[9]  
Entwisle AC, 2001, J AOAC INT, V84, P444
[10]  
Entwisle AC, 2000, J AOAC INT, V83, P1377