Preoperative oral rofecoxib reduces postoperative pain and tramadol consumption in patients after abdominal hysterectomy

被引:33
作者
Karamanlioglu, B [1 ]
Turan, A [1 ]
Memis, D [1 ]
Türe, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000103295.31539.A7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We designed this study to determine whether the administration of a preoperative dose of rofecoxib to patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy would decrease patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) tramadol use or enhance analgesia. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either oral placebo or rofecoxib 50 mg 1 h before surgery. All patients received a standard anesthetic protocol. Intraoperative blood loss was determined. At the end of surgery, all patients received tramadol IV via a PCA-device. Pain scores, sedation scores, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were assessed at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Total and incremental tramadol consumption at the same times was recorded from the PCA-device. Antiemetic requirements and adverse effects were noted during the first postoperative 24 h. Duration of hospital stay was also recorded. The pain scores were significantly lower in the rofecoxib group compared with the placebo group at 6 times during the first 12 postoperative h (P < 0.05). The total consumption of tramadol (627 +/- 69 mg versus 535 +/- 45 mg; P < 0.05) and the incremental doses at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after surgery were significantly more in the placebo group than in the rofecoxib group. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, sedation scores, hemodynamic variables, peripheral oxygen saturation, antiemetic requirements, or adverse effects after surgery. The length of hospital stay was also similar in the groups. We conclude that the preoperative administration of oral rofecoxib provided a significant analgesic benefit and decreased the opioid requirements in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1043
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Evaluation of Preoperative administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery [J].
Bekker, A ;
Cooper, PR ;
Frempong-Boadu, A ;
Babu, R ;
Errico, T ;
Lebovits, A .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 50 (05) :1053-1057
[2]   Celecoxib - A review of its use in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain [J].
Clemett, D ;
Goa, KL .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (04) :957-980
[3]   Characterization of rofecoxib as a cyclooxygenase-2 isoform inhibitor and demonstration of analgesia in the dental pain model [J].
Ehrich, EW ;
Dallob, A ;
De Lepeleire, I ;
Van Hecken, A ;
Riendeau, D ;
Yuan, WY ;
Porras, A ;
Wittreich, J ;
Seibold, JR ;
De Schepper, P ;
Mehlisch, DR ;
Gertz, BJ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (03) :336-347
[4]  
Fishman S., 1999, ESSENTIALS PAIN MED, V1, P51
[5]   Preoperative oral rofecoxib does not decrease postoperative pain or morphine consumption in patients after radical prostatectomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Huang, JJ ;
Taguchi, A ;
Hsu, HP ;
Andriole, GL ;
Kurz, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2001, 13 (02) :94-97
[6]   Cost-efficacy of rofecoxib versus acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory surgery [J].
Issioui, T ;
Klein, KW ;
White, PF ;
Watcha, MF ;
Skrivanek, GD ;
Jones, SB ;
Hu, J ;
Marple, BF ;
Ing, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (04) :931-937
[7]  
JELLINEK H, 1990, ANAESTHESIST, V39, P513
[8]   Effect of peri- and postoperative epidural anaesthesia on pain and gastrointestinal function after abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Jorgensen, H ;
Fomsgaard, JS ;
Dirks, J ;
Wetterslev, J ;
Andreasson, B ;
Dahl, JB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (04) :577-583
[9]  
Kam PCA, 2000, PAIN REV, V7, P3
[10]   Preoperative oral celecoxib versus preoperative oral rofecoxib for pain relief after thyroid surgery [J].
Karamanlioglu, B ;
Arar, C ;
Alagöl, A ;
Çolak, A ;
Gemlik, I ;
Süt, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (06) :490-495