The predictive value of renal vascular resistance for late renal allograft loss

被引:9
作者
de Vries, APJ [1 ]
van Son, WJ [1 ]
van der Heide, JJH [1 ]
Ploeg, RJ [1 ]
Navis, G [1 ]
de Jong, PE [1 ]
Gans, ROB [1 ]
Bakker, SJL [1 ]
Gansevoort, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Renal Transplant Program, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
graft survival; kidney transplantation; mortality; renal vascular resistance; risk markers;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01192.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The renal artery resistance index (RI), assessed by Doppler ultrasonography, was recently identified as a new risk marker for late renal allograft loss. This finding requires confirmation since RI in that study was not measured at predetermined time points and ultrasonography is operator-dependent. We investigated the predictive value of renal vascular resistance (RVR), a less operator-dependent method as assessed by mean arterial pressure divided by renal blood flow, for the prediction of recipient mortality and death-censored graft loss. RVR was compared to commonly used risk markers such as creatinine clearance (CrCl), serum creatinine (SCreat) and proteinuria (UProt) in 793 first-time cadaveric renal transplant recipients at predetermined time points after transplantation using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Cox survival analyses. The present study showed that RVR is a prominent risk marker for recipient mortality and death-censored graft loss. However, the predictive value of RVR for recipient mortality owed mainly to the impact of mean arterial blood pressure. In contrast, RVR constituted more than the sum of its components for death-censored graft loss, but showed less predictive value than SCreat in univariate analysis. As the assessment of RVR is expensive and time-consuming, we believe that RVR holds no clinical merit for the follow-up of renal transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 370
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Apperloo AJ, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P567
[2]   Relationship between the resistive index and vascular compliance and resistance [J].
Bude, RO ;
Rubin, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (02) :411-417
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]  
Giraudeau B, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V349, P1573
[6]   Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. [J].
Hariharan, S ;
Johnson, CP ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Taranto, SE ;
McIntosh, MJ ;
Stablein, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (09) :605-612
[7]   Poor predictive value of serum creatinine for renal allograft loss [J].
Kaplan, B ;
Schold, J ;
Meier-Kriesche, HU .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (12) :1560-1565
[8]   A thirty percent chronic decline in inverse serum creatinine is an excellent predictor of late renal allograft failure [J].
Kasiske, BL ;
Andany, MA ;
Danielson, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (04) :762-768
[9]  
Kasiske BL, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, pS1
[10]  
Kreis HA, 2001, TRANSPLANTATION, V71, pSS5