Optimal design of a hydrodynamic separator for treating runoff from roadways

被引:24
作者
Duyen Tran [1 ]
Kang, Joo-Hyon [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ Seoul, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 100715, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Stormwater; Urban runoff; Underground stormwater treatment device; Hydrodynamic separator; Optimization; STORM-WATER TREATMENT; POLLUTANT REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigated the removal efficiency of target pollutants from an underground stormwater treatment device (a hydrodynamic separator), focusing on the overall performance of the devices of a catchment. An approach for sizing an underground stormwater treatment device was developed, in order to obtain the required reduction percentage of the total suspended solids (TSS) generated from a given impervious catchment. The United States Environmental Protection Agency's stormwater management model (SWMM) was used for developing contours to help determine the size of the device, with respect to the maximum inflow to the device (or bypass rate), and the catchment area served by the device. Additionally, three different configurations of underground stormwater treatment devices were examined. It was found that, for a given catchment area, a single large device provides slightly better performance than multiple small devices. The approach we propose here can be useful to determine the sizes, as well as to clarify the efficiencies, of different installation configurations of underground stormwater treatment device (e.g. a hydrodynamic separator) in relation to their bypass rates and site specific conditions, such as rainfall characteristics and the catchment area to be served. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Alley W. M., 1981, WATER RESOUR RES, V17, P161
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STORM WAT TECHN FACT
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION AND A COMPARISON WITH OTHER METHODS [J].
BOX, MJ .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1965, 8 (01) :42-52
[4]  
Bryant G., 2007, GWRC P
[5]  
Huber W.C., 1986, P ENG FDN C, P34
[6]  
Huber W.C., 1985, NATO ASI Series, Series G: Ecological Science 10, P166
[7]  
Imteaz M., 2010, WORLD ACAD SCI ENG T, V61, P891
[8]  
Jewell T.K., 1982, URBAN STORMWATER QUA, P156
[9]   Implications of a kinematic wave model for first flush treatment design [J].
Kang, Joo-Hyon ;
Kayhanian, Masoud ;
Stenstrom, Michael K. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (20) :3820-3830
[10]  
Kim J., 2007, P 9 BIENN C STORMW R