Excess sensitivity and asymmetries in consumption: An empirical investigation

被引:43
作者
Garcia, R
Lusardi, A
Ng, S
机构
[1] DARTMOUTH COLL,HANOVER,NH 03755
[2] BOSTON COLL,CHESTNUT HILL,MA 02167
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2953673
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Most empirical studies on liquidity constraints classify a consumer as being constrained on the basis of a single indicator such as the asset-to-income ratio. In this analysis. we model the probability that a consumer faces liquidity constraints as a function of multiple social and economic factors. This probability function is estimated simultaneously with the degree of excess sensitivity of consumption to income in a switching regressions framework. The switching regressions apply optimal weights to the densities for the Euler equations in the two states and are less susceptible to sample misclassification. Our results based on data from the CEX confirm that liquidity-constrained consumers are excessively sensitive to variables already known to economic agents. However. there is also evidence that the unconstrained consumers exhibit behavior that is inconsistent with the theoretical predictions. Further analysis suggests that such behavior could be explained by time-nonseparable preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 176
页数:23
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ABEL AB, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P38
[2]   TESTING THE RESPONSE OF CONSUMPTION TO INCOME CHANGES WITH (NOISY) PANEL DATA [J].
ALTONJI, JG ;
SIOW, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (02) :293-328
[3]   HOUSEHOLD CHOICES IN EQUILIBRIUM [J].
ALTUG, S ;
MILLER, RA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1990, 58 (03) :543-570
[4]  
ANGRIST JD, 1992, J AM STAT ASSOC, V87, P328
[5]  
Attanasio O.P., 1995, CARNEGIE ROCHESTER C, VVol. 42, P39
[6]   IS CONSUMPTION GROWTH CONSISTENT WITH INTERTEMPORAL OPTIMIZATION - EVIDENCE FROM THE CONSUMER EXPENDITURE SURVEY [J].
ATTANASIO, OP ;
WEBER, G .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1995, 103 (06) :1121-1157
[7]  
Attanasio OP, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1118
[8]  
BOWMAN D, 1993, UNPUB LOSS AVERSION
[9]  
Browning M, 1996, J ECON LIT, V34, P1797
[10]  
Chamberlain G., 1984, HDB ECONOMETRICS, V2, P1247