Do growth yield efficiencies differ between soil microbial communities differing in fungal: bacterial ratios? Reality check and methodological issues

被引:195
作者
Thiet, RK
Frey, SD
Six, J
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nat Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
fungal; bacterial biomass ratio; growth yield efficiency; substrate-induced respiration; C sequestration;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.010
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil communities dominated by fungi such as those of no-tillage (NT) agroecosystems are often associated with greater soil organic matter (SOM) storage. This has been attributed in part to fungi having a higher growth yield efficiency (GYE) compared to bacteria. That is, for each unit of substrate C utilized, fungi invest a greater proportion into biomass and metabolite production than do bacteria. The assumption of higher fungal efficiency may be unfounded because results from studies in which fungal and bacterial efficiencies have been characterized are equivocal and because few studies have measured microbial GYE directly. In this study, we measured microbial GYE in agricultural soils by following C-13-labeled glucose loss, total CO2-C, and (CO2)-C-13-C evolution at 2 h intervals for 20 h in two experiments (differing in N amendment levels) in which the fungal: bacterial biomass ratios (F:B) were manipulated. No differences in efficiency were observed for communities with high versus low F:B in soils with or without added inorganic N. When calculated using (CO2)-C-13-C (in contrast to total CO2-C) evolution, growth yield efficiencies of soils having high and low F:B were 0.69 +/- 0.01 and 0.70 +/- 0.01, respectively. When soils were amended with N, soils with high and low F:B had growth yield efficiencies of 0.78 +/- 0.01 and 0.76 +/- 0.01, respectively. Our experiments do not support the widely held assumption that soil fungi have greater growth efficiency than soil bacteria. Thus, claims of greater fungal efficiency may be unsubstantiated and should be evoked cautiously when explaining the mechanisms underlying greater C storage and slower C turnover in fungal-dominated soils. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Fungal-to-bacterial ratios in soils investigated for enhanced C sequestration [J].
Bailey, VL ;
Smith, JL ;
Bolton, H .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 34 (07) :997-1007
[2]   Seasonal changes in soil microbial communities along a fertility gradient of temperate grasslands [J].
Bardgett, RD ;
Lovell, RD ;
Hobbs, PJ ;
Jarvis, SC .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (07) :1021-1030
[3]  
Bardgett RD, 1996, BIOL FERT SOILS, V22, P261, DOI 10.1007/BF00382522
[4]   The measurement of soil fungal:bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands [J].
Bardgett, RD ;
McAlister, E .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1999, 29 (03) :282-290
[5]   MICROBIAL AND FAUNAL INTERACTIONS AND EFFECTS ON LITTER NITROGEN AND DECOMPOSITION IN AGROECOSYSTEMS [J].
BEARE, MH ;
PARMELEE, RW ;
HENDRIX, PF ;
CHENG, WX ;
COLEMAN, DC ;
CROSSLEY, DA .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1992, 62 (04) :569-591
[6]   Priming effect and C storage in semi-arid no-till spring crop rotations [J].
Bell, JM ;
Smith, JL ;
Bailey, VL ;
Bolton, H .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2003, 37 (04) :237-244
[7]   CARBON CONVERSION EFFICIENCY FOR BACTERIAL-GROWTH ON LIGNOCELLULOSE - IMPLICATIONS FOR DETRITUS-BASED FOOD WEBS [J].
BENNER, R ;
LAY, J ;
KNEES, E ;
HODSON, RE .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1988, 33 (06) :1514-1526
[8]  
BINGEMAN C. W., 1953, Proceedings. Soil Science Society of America, V17, P34
[9]   Interactive effects of pH and substrate quality on the fungal-to-bacterial ratio and QCO2 of microbial communities in forest soils [J].
Blagodatskaya, EV ;
Anderson, TH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 30 (10-11) :1269-1274
[10]   Influence of microbial populations and residue quality on aggregate stability [J].
Bossuyt, H ;
Denef, K ;
Six, J ;
Frey, SD ;
Merckx, R ;
Paustian, K .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2001, 16 (03) :195-208