Conditioned locomotion induced by unilateral intrastriatal administration of Apomorphine:: D2 receptor activation is critical but not the expression of the unconditioned response

被引:15
作者
Dias, FRC
Carey, RJ
Carrera, MP
机构
[1] State Univ N Fluminense, Hlth Anim Lab, Beh Pharmacol Grp, BR-28013600 Campos Dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Res & Dev, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
conditioning; dorsal striatum; Apomorphine; SCH; 23390; sulpiride; locomotor activity;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study examined the role of D-1 and D-2 receptors in the conditioning of Apomorphine-induced locomotor behavior. A Pavlovian conditioning protocol was used in which rats received 5 daily intrastriatal Apomorphine treatments paired or unpaired to an open-field environment followed, 2 days later, by a saline test for conditioning. In the conditioning induction phase, the intrastriatal Apomorphine treatment increased locomotor activity expressed as an increased number of sectional crossings and rearings. In the conditioning test, the Apomorphine-paired group had significantly higher locomotor activity than the unpaired and vehicle groups, consistent with the development of a conditioned locomotor response. The concomitant blockade of D-1 and D-2 receptors with D, (SCH23390) and D-2 (Sulpiride) antagonists prevented the Apomorphine-induced behavioral response during the induction phase and in the conditioning test. Pretreatment with the D, antagonist SCH 23390 also blocked the Apomorphine-induced behavioral response during the induction phase but did not block the Apomorphine conditioned response. Pretreatment with the selective D-2 antagonist Sulpiride blocked the Apomorphine behavioral response during the induction phase and in the conditioning test. Altogether, these results indicate that antagonism of either the D-1 or D-2 receptors in the dorsal striatum can block Apomorphine-induced locomotor activation but that D-2 but not D-1 antagonism can prevent the development of the Apomorphine conditioned response. Altogether, these findings indicate a key role for the D-2 receptor site in the mediation of Apomorphine conditioned behavior; and, in addition, that Apomorphine conditioned locomotor response can develop without the expression of the locomotor stimulant response during the induction phase of conditioning. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EVIDENCE FOR DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATION BY APOMORPHINE [J].
ANDEN, NE ;
RUBENSON, A ;
FUXE, K ;
HOKFELT, T .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1967, 19 (09) :627-&
[3]  
ANTONIOU K, 1988, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V97, P13
[4]   Drug conditioning induced by intrastriatal apomorphine administration [J].
Carrera, MP ;
Brunhara, FC ;
Schwarting, RKW ;
Tomaz, C .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 790 (1-2) :60-66
[5]   CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO COCAINE PLACEBO IN HUMANS - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
CASCELLA, N ;
MUNTANER, C ;
KUMOR, KM ;
NAGOSHI, CT ;
JAFFE, JH ;
SHERER, MA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 25 (03) :285-295
[6]   BEHAVIORAL HABITUATION TO SPATIAL NOVELTY - INTERFERENCE AND NONINTERFERENCE STUDIES [J].
CERBONE, A ;
SADILE, AG .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1994, 18 (04) :497-518
[7]   Effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptor antagonists on the establishment and expression of conditioned locomotion to cocaine in rats [J].
Cervo, L ;
Samanin, R .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1996, 731 (1-2) :31-38
[8]   CONDITIONING OF DRUG-INDUCED PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES [J].
EIKELBOOM, R ;
STEWART, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 89 (05) :507-528
[9]   MODE OF ACTION OF APOMORPHINE AND DEXAMPHETAMINE ON GNAWING COMPULSION IN RATS [J].
ERNST, AM .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1967, 10 (04) :316-316
[10]  
GOLD MS, 1986, ABSTR SOC NEUROSCI, V12, P936